ReviewJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2011
Detection and identification of microorganisms in wine: a review of molecular techniques.
Review in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flow Cytometry-Based Monitoring of Microbial Dynamics During Grape Must Fermentation Under Different Inoculation Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A Novel PCR-Based Tool to Trace OenologicalFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Molecular Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The establishment of a fungal consortium in a new winery.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Yeast Monitoring of Wine Mixed or Sequential Fermentations Made by Native Strains from D.O. "Vinos de Madrid" Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Genetic Polymorphism in Wine Yeasts: Mechanisms and Methods for Its Detection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Review
- 16S rRNAFood technology and biotechnology · 2016Article
- Biodiversity of Lactobacillus plantarum from traditional Italian wines.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2014Article
- High‑throughput sequencing of amplicons for monitoring yeast biodiversity in must and during alcoholic fermentation.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2014Article
- Biogeographical characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast by molecular methods.Frontiers in microbiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The microbial ecology of wine is complex. Microbes can play both positive and negative roles in the quality of the final product. Due to this impact, the microbial ecology of wine has been well studied. Traditional indirect methods, such as plating, have largely been replaced by a number of molecular methods. These methods are typically either indirect methods used for identification of cultured organisms, or direct methods used to profile whole populations or identify specific microbes in a mixed population. These molecular methods offer a number of advantages over traditional methods including speed and precision. This review will examine both direct and indirect molecular methods, provide examples of their impact on the study of the microbial ecology of wine, and also discuss their strengths and limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21822905What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.