Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21822676›Full record

ArticleDer Pathologe2011

[Correlation of cervical cytology and histology].

K Marquardt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Pathologe, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02693379 (Cervical Cancer Screening in Madagascar), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02693379 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Cervical Cancer Screening in Madagascar: Usability of Mobile Telemedicine for Detection of Precancerous Lesions From Smartphone Photos

TypeinterventionalSponsorProf. Patrick PetignatRan2015 to 2015Enrolled1,041ConditionsCervical PrecancerArmsD-VIA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

K MarquardtPraxis für Pathologie, Güstrower Str. 34, 19055, Schwerin, Deutschland. gynpatho-schwerin@arcor.de

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lack of correlation of cytological diagnoses with subsequent histological tissue diagnoses in cervical pathology is caused by either sampling or by interpretation errors. The term sampling error refers to both obtaining cytological material by a cervical smear as well as obtaining tissue samples by surgical procedures such as biopsy or conization. The term interpretation error refers to a lack of correlation as a consequence of the subjective variability in the diagnostic evaluation of cytological, histological or colposcopic findings. This so-called interobserver variability is well known and of considerable significance. Cytological-histological correlation is an important and mandatory method of quality assurance in the cytology laboratory. Lack of correlation can be crucial for the patient because of possible over treatment or under treatment. It can also undermine the relationship between cytopathologists and clinicians. It is therefore crucial to recognize the sources of error presented in this review and to make an effort to resolve discordances by communication and second review.

Indexed as

BiopsyCervix UteriDiagnosis, DifferentialFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisQuality Assurance, Health CareStatistics as TopicUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.