Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21822627›Full record

Trial reportAIDS and behavior2012

No "magic bullet": exploring community mobilization strategies used in a multi-site community based randomized controlled trial: Project Accept (HPTN 043).

Virginia A Tedrow, Carla E Zelaya, Caitlin E Kennedy, Stephen F Morin, Gertrude Khumalo-Sakutukwa, Michael D Sweat, David D Celentano

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mobile clinics for women's and children's health.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Virginia A TedrowDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615N. Wolfe Street/Room E5037, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. vtedrow@jhsph.edu
Carla E Zelaya
Caitlin E Kennedy
Stephen F Morin
Gertrude Khumalo-Sakutukwa
Michael D Sweat
David D Celentano
Johns Hopkins University · USSan Francisco AIDS Foundation · USMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027763 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Monica Gandhi · 1988 to 2026
$93.6M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025008 · NCRR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2007 to 2011
$29.0M
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
Community-Based HIV VCT: South AfricaU01MH066701 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COATES, THOMAS J. · 2003 to 2010
$24.3M
Community-Based VCT: ZimbabweU01MH066702 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MORIN, STEPHEN F · 2003 to 2010
$13.4M
Community-Based VCT: TanzaniaU01MH066688 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SWEAT, MICHAEL D · 2003 to 2010
$11.7M
Community-Based VCT: ThailandU01MH066687 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CELENTANO, DAVID D. · 2003 to 2010
$9.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025008NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027763NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH066687NIMH NIH HHS U01MH066687NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH066688NIMH NIH HHS U01MH066688NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH066701NIMH NIH HHS U01MH066701NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH066702NIMH NIH HHS U01MH066702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As community-level interventions become more common in HIV prevention, processes such as community mobilization (CM) are increasingly utilized in public health programs and research. Project Accept, a multi-site community randomized controlled trial, is testing the hypothesis that CM coupled with community-based mobile voluntary counseling and testing and post-test support services will alter community norms and reduce the incidence of HIV. By using a multiple-case study approach, this qualitative study identifies seven major community mobilization strategies used in Project Accept, including stakeholder buy-in, formation of community coalitions, community engagement, community participation, raising community awareness, involvement of leaders, and partnership building, and describes three key elements of mobilization success.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAfrica South of the SaharaCommunity Health ServicesDirective CounselingFemaleHealth EducationHumansIncidenceMaleMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareQuality Assurance, Health CareRisk-TakingThailand

Identifiers

PMID21822627
PMCPMC3400971
OpenAlexW2047116751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.