Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21822500›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in chemical biology2010

Nucleotide Analogues as Probes for DNA and RNA Polymerases.

Robert D Kuchta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in chemical biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Incorporation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Anticancer Properties of Cordycepin and Their Underlying Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert D KuchtaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.

Funding

Mechanism of Herpes DNA ReplicationR01AI059764 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI KUCHTA, ROBERT D · 2005 to 2014
$2.4M
MECHANISM OF DNA POLYMERASE ALPHA-PRIMASER01GM054194 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI KUCHTA, ROBERT D · 1996 to 2009
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI059764NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleotide analogues represent a major class of anti-cancer and anti-viral drugs, and provide an extremely powerful tool for dissecting the mechanisms of DNA and RNA polymerases. While the basic assays themselves are relatively straight-forward, a key issue is to appropriately design the studies to answer the mechanistic question of interest. This article addresses the major issues involved in designing these studies, and some of the potential difficulties that arise in interpreting the data. Examples are given both of the type of analogues typically used, the experimental approaches with different polymerases, and issues with data interpretation.

Identifiers

PMID21822500
PMCPMC3149870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.