ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2012
Complementary and Alternative Drugs Use among Preoperative Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy.
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge levels of doctors and nurses working in surgical clinics about nutrients and food supplements, a multicentre descriptive study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- The use of dietary supplements by patients in the pre-operative period in the Czech Republic.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020Article
- Herbal Use among Presurgical Patients in Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2018Article
- Interactions between dietary supplements in hospitalized patients.Internal and emergency medicine · 2016Article
- Herbal medicine use by surgery patients in Hungary: a descriptive study.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2015Article
- Herbal hepatotoxicity: a hidden epidemic.Internal and emergency medicine · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complementary and alternative drugs (CADs) are widely used in preoperative patients and may lead to potential interactions and adverse reactions. The aim of our study is to evaluate the prevalence and the predictors of CADs use among preoperative patients using data from an Italian survey. This cross-sectional study, which enrolled 478 patients (response rate: 83.5%), was carried out in three Tuscany hospitals (Italy). The prevalence of CADs use was 49.8%: 233 out of 238 participants used herbal products and/or dietary supplements. Valeriana officinalis was the most reported product (19.4%). According to univariate analysis, users were commonly identified among middle-aged or older patients; unadjusted ORs were 2.1 (95% CI: 1.3-3.3) for patients aged 48-69 years, and 3.0 (95% CI: 1.9-4.7) for those of 70-95 years, when compared with individuals aged 18-47 years. Except for education and gender, adjusted estimates showed consistent results with univariate analyses: direct association was observed with higher education, and-although not significantly-with female gender. The high prevalence of CAD use in preoperative period could be suggestive of a certain risk of adverse effects due to CADs interactions. A careful medical history of CADs consumption should be ascertained before surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.