Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21822441›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2012

Complementary and Alternative Drugs Use among Preoperative Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy.

Ersilia Lucenteforte, Eugenia Gallo, Alessandra Pugi, Federica Giommoni, Angelica Paoletti, Michele Vietri, Patrizia Lupi, Maristella La Torre, Gianluca Diddi, Fabio Firenzuoli and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Herbal medicine use by surgery patients in Hungary: a descriptive study.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2015
    Article
  6. Herbal hepatotoxicity: a hidden epidemic.Internal and emergency medicine · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ersilia LucenteforteDepartment of Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacology "M. Aiazzi Mancini", University of Florence, Viale G. Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Eugenia Gallo
Alessandra Pugi
Federica Giommoni
Angelica Paoletti
Michele Vietri
Patrizia Lupi
Maristella La Torre
Gianluca Diddi
Fabio Firenzuoli
Alessandro Mugelli
Alfredo Vannacci
Francesco Lapi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complementary and alternative drugs (CADs) are widely used in preoperative patients and may lead to potential interactions and adverse reactions. The aim of our study is to evaluate the prevalence and the predictors of CADs use among preoperative patients using data from an Italian survey. This cross-sectional study, which enrolled 478 patients (response rate: 83.5%), was carried out in three Tuscany hospitals (Italy). The prevalence of CADs use was 49.8%: 233 out of 238 participants used herbal products and/or dietary supplements. Valeriana officinalis was the most reported product (19.4%). According to univariate analysis, users were commonly identified among middle-aged or older patients; unadjusted ORs were 2.1 (95% CI: 1.3-3.3) for patients aged 48-69 years, and 3.0 (95% CI: 1.9-4.7) for those of 70-95 years, when compared with individuals aged 18-47 years. Except for education and gender, adjusted estimates showed consistent results with univariate analyses: direct association was observed with higher education, and-although not significantly-with female gender. The high prevalence of CAD use in preoperative period could be suggestive of a certain risk of adverse effects due to CADs interactions. A careful medical history of CADs consumption should be ascertained before surgery.

Identifiers

PMID21822441
PMCPMC3142854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.