Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21822425›Full record

ReviewExperimental diabetes research2012

Cell-based therapies for diabetic complications.

Stella Bernardi, Giovanni Maria Severini, Giorgio Zauli, Paola Secchiero

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental diabetes research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Novel lipid mediator 7Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Setd4 controlled quiescent c-KitScientific reports · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stella BernardiDepartment of Morphology and Embriology and LTTA Centre, University of Ferrara, 44100 Ferrara, Italy.
Giovanni Maria Severini
Giorgio Zauli
Paola Secchiero

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, accumulating experimental evidence supports the notion that diabetic patients may greatly benefit from cell-based therapies, which include the use of adult stem and/or progenitor cells. In particular, mesenchymal stem cells and the circulating pool of endothelial progenitor cells have so far been the most studied populations of cells proposed for the treatment of vascular complications affecting diabetic patients. We review the evidence supporting their use in this setting, the therapeutic benefits that these cells have shown so far as well as the challenges that cell-based therapies in diabetic complications put out.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusDiabetic AngiopathiesDiabetic CardiomyopathiesHumansMiceNeovascularization, PhysiologicRatsWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID21822425
PMCPMC3123995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.