Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21821780›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2011

Mechanisms of atrial-selective block of Na⁺ channels by ranolazine: II. Insights from a mathematical model.

Vladislav V Nesterenko, Andrew C Zygmunt, Sridharan Rajamani, Luiz Belardinelli, Charles Antzelevitch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Eugenol and lidocaine inhibit voltage-gated NaFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Inhibition of voltage-gated NaHeart rhythm O2 · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The role of late I Na in development of cardiac arrhythmias.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2014
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Computational cardiology: how computer simulations could be used to develop new therapies and advance existing ones.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2012
    Review
  16. Computational approaches to understand cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vladislav V NesterenkoMasonic Medical Research Laboratory, 2150 Bleecker St., Utica, NY 13501, USA. vlad@mmrl.edu
Andrew C Zygmunt
Sridharan Rajamani
Luiz Belardinelli
Charles Antzelevitch
Masonic Medical Research Laboratory · USGilead Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

ELECTRICAL HETEROGENEITY AND CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIASR01HL047678 · NHLBI · MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY, INC · PI ANTZELEVITCH, CHARLES · 1993 to 2014
$5.7M
ELECTRICAL HETEROGENEITY AND CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIASR55HL047678 · NHLBI · MASONIC MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY, INC · PI ANTZELEVITCH, CHARLES · 1992 to 1992
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-47678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Block of Na(+) channel conductance by ranolazine displays marked atrial selectivity that is an order of magnitude higher that of other class I antiarrhythmic drugs. Here, we present a Markovian model of the Na(+) channel gating, which includes activation-inactivation coupling, aimed at elucidating the mechanisms underlying this potent atrial selectivity of ranolazine. The model incorporates experimentally observed differences between atrial and ventricular Na(+) channel gating, including a more negative position of the steady-state inactivation curve in atrial versus ventricular cells. The model assumes that ranolazine requires a hydrophilic access pathway to the channel binding site, which is modulated by both activation and inactivation gates of the channel. Kinetic rate constants were obtained using guarded receptor analysis of the use-dependent block of the fast Na(+) current (I(Na)). The model successfully reproduces all experimentally observed phenomena, including the shift of channel availability, the sensitivity of block to holding or diastolic potential, and the preferential block of slow versus fast I(Na.) Using atrial and ventricular action potential-shaped voltage pulses, the model confirms significantly greater use-dependent block of peak I(Na) in atrial versus ventricular cells. The model highlights the importance of action potential prolongation and of a steeper voltage dependence of the time constant of unbinding of ranolazine from the atrial Na(+) channel in the development of use-dependent I(Na) block. Our model predictions indicate that differences in channel gating properties as well as action potential morphology between atrial and ventricular cells contribute equally to the atrial selectivity of ranolazine. The model indicates that the steep voltage dependence of ranolazine interaction with the Na(+) channel at negative potentials underlies the mechanism of the predominant block of I(Na) in atrial cells by ranolazine.

Indexed as

Sodium Channel BlockersAcetanilidesAnimalsComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHeartHeart AtriaHeart VentriclesKineticsMarkov ChainsModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalMyocytes, CardiacPiperazinesRanolazineSodium ChannelsAcetanilidesPiperazinesRanolazineSodium Channel BlockersSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID21821780
PMCPMC3197376
OpenAlexW1978955518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.