Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21821750›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011

Chlortetracycline-resistant intestinal bacteria in organically raised and feral Swine.

Thad B Stanton, Samuel B Humphrey, William C Stoffregen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antibiotic Resistance: From Pig to Meat.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Bloom of resident antibiotic-resistant bacteria in soil following manure fertilization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. In-feed antibiotic effects on the swine intestinal microbiome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thad B StantonFood Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA 50010, USA. Thad.Stanton@ars.usda.gov
Samuel B Humphrey
William C Stoffregen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organically raised swine had high fecal populations of chlortetracycline (CTC)-resistant (growing at 64 μg CTC/ml) Escherichia coli, Megasphaera elsdenii, and anaerobic bacteria. By comparison, CTC-resistant bacteria in feral swine feces were over 1,000-fold fewer and exhibited lower taxonomic diversity.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaChlortetracyclineFecesGastrointestinal TractSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsChlortetracycline

Identifiers

PMID21821750
PMCPMC3194871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.