Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21821659›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2011

Improved accuracy of supervised CRM discovery with interpolated Markov models and cross-species comparison.

Majid Kazemian, Qiyun Zhu, Marc S Halfon, Saurabh Sinha

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification of a novel downstreammicroPublication biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. CRM Discovery Beyond Model Insects.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Majid KazemianDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Qiyun Zhu
Marc S Halfon
Saurabh Sinha

Funding

High sensitivity discovery of cis-regulatory modulesR01GM085233 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HALFON, MARC S, SINHA, SAURABH · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM085233-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances in experimental approaches for identifying transcriptional cis-regulatory modules (CRMs, 'enhancers'), direct empirical discovery of CRMs for all genes in all cell types and environmental conditions is likely to remain an elusive goal. Effective methods for computational CRM discovery are thus a critically needed complement to empirical approaches. However, existing computational methods that search for clusters of putative binding sites are ineffective if the relevant TFs and/or their binding specificities are unknown. Here, we provide a significantly improved method for 'motif-blind' CRM discovery that does not depend on knowledge or accurate prediction of TF-binding motifs and is effective when limited knowledge of functional CRMs is available to 'supervise' the search. We propose a new statistical method, based on 'Interpolated Markov Models', for motif-blind, genome-wide CRM discovery. It captures the statistical profile of variable length words in known CRMs of a regulatory network and finds candidate CRMs that match this profile. The method also uses orthologs of the known CRMs from closely related genomes. We perform in silico evaluation of predicted CRMs by assessing whether their neighboring genes are enriched for the expected expression patterns. This assessment uses a novel statistical test that extends the widely used Hypergeometric test of gene set enrichment to account for variability in intergenic lengths. We find that the new CRM prediction method is superior to existing methods. Finally, we experimentally validate 12 new CRM predictions by examining their regulatory activity in vivo in Drosophila; 10 of the tested CRMs were found to be functional, while 6 of the top 7 predictions showed the expected activity patterns. We make our program available as downloadable source code, and as a plugin for a genome browser installed on our servers.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalAnimalsBinding SitesDrosophilaGene ExpressionGenomeMarkov ChainsTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21821659
PMCPMC3239187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.