ArticleNucleic acids research2011
Improved accuracy of supervised CRM discovery with interpolated Markov models and cross-species comparison.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- A chromatin accessibility map of pea aphid brain and embryo identifies tissue-specific regulatory elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- EnhancerMatcher: comparing cell-type-specific enhancer activity of DNA sequences using deep convolutional neural networks and explainable AI.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Article
- Intracellular spatial transcriptomic analysis toolkit (InSTAnT).Nature communications · 2024Article
- Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Identification of a novel downstreammicroPublication biology · 2024Article
- Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- A novel role for trithorax in the gene regulatory network for a rapidly evolving fruit fly pigmentation trait.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Intracellular Spatial Transcriptomic Analysis Toolkit (InSTAnT).Research square · 2023Article
- Prediction accuracy of regulatory elements from sequence varies by functional sequencing technique.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Review
- Identification of new Anopheles gambiae transcriptional enhancers using a cross-species prediction approach.Insect molecular biology · 2021Article
- Annotating the Insect Regulatory Genome.Insects · 2021Review
- Computational enhancer prediction: evaluation and improvements.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- REDfly: the transcriptional regulatory element database for Drosophila.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- CRM Discovery Beyond Model Insects.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019Article
- Enhancer identification and activity evaluation in the red flour beetle,Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite recent advances in experimental approaches for identifying transcriptional cis-regulatory modules (CRMs, 'enhancers'), direct empirical discovery of CRMs for all genes in all cell types and environmental conditions is likely to remain an elusive goal. Effective methods for computational CRM discovery are thus a critically needed complement to empirical approaches. However, existing computational methods that search for clusters of putative binding sites are ineffective if the relevant TFs and/or their binding specificities are unknown. Here, we provide a significantly improved method for 'motif-blind' CRM discovery that does not depend on knowledge or accurate prediction of TF-binding motifs and is effective when limited knowledge of functional CRMs is available to 'supervise' the search. We propose a new statistical method, based on 'Interpolated Markov Models', for motif-blind, genome-wide CRM discovery. It captures the statistical profile of variable length words in known CRMs of a regulatory network and finds candidate CRMs that match this profile. The method also uses orthologs of the known CRMs from closely related genomes. We perform in silico evaluation of predicted CRMs by assessing whether their neighboring genes are enriched for the expected expression patterns. This assessment uses a novel statistical test that extends the widely used Hypergeometric test of gene set enrichment to account for variability in intergenic lengths. We find that the new CRM prediction method is superior to existing methods. Finally, we experimentally validate 12 new CRM predictions by examining their regulatory activity in vivo in Drosophila; 10 of the tested CRMs were found to be functional, while 6 of the top 7 predictions showed the expected activity patterns. We make our program available as downloadable source code, and as a plugin for a genome browser installed on our servers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.