ArticleJournal of molecular biology2011
HIV-1 reverse transcriptase dissociates during strand transfer.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Template-primer binding affinity and RNase H cleavage specificity contribute to the strand transfer efficiency of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Steps in the replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) occurring in the virus but not in the host are preferred targets of antiretroviral therapy. Strand transfer is unique; the DNA strand being made by viral reverse transcriptase (RT) is moved from one RNA template position to another. Understanding the mechanism requires knowing whether the RT directly mediates the template exchange or dissociates during the exchange, so that it occurs by polymer dynamics. Earlier work in vitro showed that the presence of an RT-trapping polymer would allow synthesis on the original or donor template but completely block transfer and subsequent synthesis on the second or acceptor template. One interpretation is that the RT must dissociate during transfer, but an alternative is that sequestration of non-polymerizing RTs prevents polymerization-independent ribonuclease H (RNase H) cleavages of the donor template necessary for strand exchange. To resolve this ambiguity, we designed a primer-template system that allows strand transfer without RNase H activity. Using an RNase H negative mutant RT, we showed that a polymer trap still prevented strand transfer. This confirms that RT dissociates during strand transfer. The presence of HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein, which promotes strand exchange, had little effect on this outcome. Additional assays showed that both the wild-type RT and a multiple nucleoside RT inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 RT containing an extended fingers domain, which is characterized by its enhanced primer-template binding affinity, were unable to transfer with the trapping polymer. This implies that common sequence variations among RTs are unlikely to alter dissociation feature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.