Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21820516›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural biology2011

Solution structure and dynamics of ADF from Toxoplasma gondii.

Rahul Yadav, Prem Prakash Pathak, Vaibhav Kumar Shukla, Anupam Jain, Shubhra Srivastava, Sarita Tripathi, S V S R Krishna Pulavarti, Simren Mehta, L David Sibley, Ashish Arora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Recombinant actin-depolymerizing factor of the apicomplexanFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Dominique Soldati-Favre: BringingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rahul YadavMolecular and Structural Biology Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow 226001, India.
Prem Prakash Pathak
Vaibhav Kumar Shukla
Anupam Jain
Shubhra Srivastava
Sarita Tripathi
S V S R Krishna Pulavarti
Simren Mehta
L David Sibley
Ashish Arora
Central Drug Research Institute · INWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

PROTEIN SECRETION &INTRACELLULAR SURVIVAL BY TOXOPLASMAR01AI034036 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SIBLEY, L. DAVID · 1993 to 2019
$7.9M
Targeting the Actin Cytoskeleton in ParasitesR01AI073155 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SIBLEY, L. DAVID · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI034036NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii ADF (TgADF) belongs to a functional subtype characterized by strong G-actin sequestering activity and low F-actin severing activity. Among the characterized ADF/cofilin proteins, TgADF has the shortest length and is missing a C-terminal helix implicated in F-actin binding. In order to understand its characteristic properties, we have determined the solution structure of TgADF and studied its backbone dynamics from ¹⁵N-relaxation measurements. TgADF has conserved ADF/cofilin fold consisting of a central mixed β-sheet comprised of six β-strands that are partially surrounded by three α-helices and a C-terminal helical turn. The high G-actin sequestering activity of TgADF relies on highly structurally and dynamically optimized interactions between G-actin and G-actin binding surface of TgADF. The equilibrium dissociation constant for TgADF and rabbit muscle G-actin was 23.81 nM, as measured by ITC, which reflects very strong affinity of TgADF and G-actin interactions. The F-actin binding site of TgADF is partially formed, with a shortened F-loop that does not project out of the ellipsoid structure and a C-terminal helical turn in place of the C-terminal helix α4. Yet, it is more rigid than the F-actin binding site of Leishmania donovani cofilin. Experimental observations and structural features do not support the interaction of PIP2 with TgADF, and PIP2 does not affect the interaction of TgADF with G-actin. Overall, this study suggests that conformational flexibility of G-actin binding sites enhances the affinity of TgADF for G-actin, while conformational rigidity of F-actin binding sites of conventional ADF/cofilins is necessary for stable binding to F-actin.

Indexed as

ToxoplasmaActinsAnimalsCalorimetryComputer SimulationDestrinMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryProtozoan ProteinsRabbitsStructural Homology, ProteinSurface PropertiesThermodynamicsActinsDestrinProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21820516
PMCPMC3703439
OpenAlexW1971006831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.