Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21819597›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2011

Is race medically relevant? A qualitative study of physicians' attitudes about the role of race in treatment decision-making.

Shedra Amy Snipes, Sherrill L Sellers, Adebola Odunlami Tafawa, Lisa A Cooper, Julie C Fields, Vence L Bonham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Race, Ethnicity, and Culture in the Medical Record: Implicit Bias or Patient Advocacy?Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Intersectionality and Clinical Decision Making: The Role of Race.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nurses' Use of Race in Clinical Decision Making.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2016
    Article
  20. White Paper: SSAT Commitment to Workforce Diversity and Healthcare Disparities.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shedra Amy SnipesBiobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, 315 Health and Human Development East, University Park, PA 16802, USA. sas84@psu.edu
Sherrill L Sellers
Adebola Odunlami Tafawa
Lisa A Cooper
Julie C Fields
Vence L Bonham

Funding

Understanding the Relationships between Race, Ethnicity, Ancestry and GenomicsZIAHG200324 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BONHAM, VENCE L · 2009 to 2025
$3.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of patient race in medical decision-making is heavily debated. While some evidence suggests that patient race can be used by physicians to predict disease risk and determine drug therapy, other studies document bias and stereotyping by physicians based on patient race. It is critical, then, to explore physicians' attitudes regarding the medical relevance of patient race.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study in the United States using ten focus groups of physicians stratified by self-identified race (black or white) and led by race-concordant moderators. Physicians were presented with a medical vignette about a patient (whose race was unknown) with Type 2 diabetes and untreated hypertension, who was also a current smoker. Participants were first asked to discuss what medical information they would need to treat the patient. Then physicians were asked to explicitly discuss the importance of race to the hypothetical patient's treatment. To identify common themes, codes, key words and physician demographics were compiled into a comprehensive table that allowed for examination of similarities and differences by physician race. Common themes were identified using the software package NVivo (QSR International, v7).

resultsForty self-identified black and 50 self-identified white physicians participated in the study. All physicians - regardless of their own race - believed that medical history, family history, and weight were important for making treatment decisions for the patient. However, black and white physicians reported differences in their views about the relevance of race. Several black physicians indicated that patient race is a central factor for choosing treatment options such as aggressive therapies, patient medication and understanding disease risk. Moreover, many black physicians considered patient race important to understand the patient's views, such as alternative medicine preferences and cultural beliefs about illness. However, few white physicians explicitly indicated that the patient's race was important over-and-above medical history. Instead, white physicians reported that the patient should be treated aggressively regardless of race.

conclusionsThis investigation adds to our understanding about how physicians in the United States consider race when treating patients, and sheds light on issues physicians face when deciding the importance of race in medical decision-making.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingRacial GroupsAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21819597
PMCPMC3167748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.