Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21819589›Full record

ReviewVeterinary research2011

A review of Brucella infection in marine mammals, with special emphasis on Brucella pinnipedialis in the hooded seal (Cystophora cristata).

Ingebjørg H Nymo, Morten Tryland, Jacques Godfroid

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pathogenicity ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Serological Investigation forAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. [Zoonotic potential of brucellosis in marine mammals].Medecine tropicale et sante internationale · 2024
    Review
  11. Combination ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Cell and Tissue Tropism of Brucella spp.Infection and immunity · 2023
    Review
  16. Pathogen Exposure in White Whales (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Research on Selected Wildlife Infections in the Circumpolar Arctic-A Bibliometric Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingebjørg H NymoDepartment of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Section of Arctic Veterinary Medicine, the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Stakkevollveien 23, N-9010 Tromsø, Norway. ingebjorg.nymo@nvh.no.
Morten Tryland
Jacques Godfroid
The FRAM Centre · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucella spp. were isolated from marine mammals for the first time in 1994. Two novel species were later included in the genus; Brucella ceti and Brucella pinnipedialis, with cetaceans and seals as their preferred hosts, respectively. Brucella spp. have since been isolated from a variety of marine mammals. Pathological changes, including lesions of the reproductive organs and associated abortions, have only been registered in cetaceans. The zoonotic potential differs among the marine mammal Brucella strains. Many techniques, both classical typing and molecular microbiology, have been utilised for characterisation of the marine mammal Brucella spp. and the change from the band-based approaches to the sequence-based approaches has greatly increased our knowledge about these strains. Several clusters have been identified within the B. ceti and B. pinnipedialis species, and multiple studies have shown that the hooded seal isolates differ from other pinniped isolates. We describe how different molecular methods have contributed to species identification and differentiation of B. ceti and B. pinnipedialis, with special emphasis on the hooded seal isolates. We further discuss the potential role of B. pinnipedialis for the declining Northwest Atlantic hooded seal population.

Indexed as

CaniformiaCetaceaAnimalsBrucellaBrucellosisPrevalenceSeals, EarlessZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID21819589
PMCPMC3161862
OpenAlexW2164354393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.