Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21819527›Full record

ArticleHIV medicine2011

Does use of antiretroviral therapy regimens with high central nervous system penetration improve survival in HIV-infected adults?

H McManus, P C K Li, D Nolan, M Bloch, S Kiertiburanakul, J Y Choi, B Mulhall, K Petoumenos, J Zhou, M Law and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in HIV medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Topographies of Cortical and Subcortical Volume Loss in HIV and Aging in the cART Era.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2016
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2013
    Review
  9. Prediction of brain atrophy using three drug scores in neuroasymptomatic HIV-infected patients with controlled viremia.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

H McManusNational Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia. hmcmanus@nchecr.unsw.edu.au
P C K Li
D Nolan
M Bloch
S Kiertiburanakul
J Y Choi
B Mulhall
K Petoumenos
J Zhou
M Law
B J Brew
E Wright

Funding

The Asia-Pacific HIV Research CollaborationU01AI069907 · NIAID · FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH · PI ANNETTE H SOHN · 2006 to 2026
$44.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was to determine whether combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) with high central nervous system penetration-effectiveness (CPE) rank (neurocART) is associated with increased survival benefit compared with non-neurocART.

methodsProspective data were examined for HIV-positive patients in the Asia Pacific HIV Observational Database who had commenced cART. CPE rank was calculated using the 2010 rankings process. NeurocART status was assigned to regimens with a CPE rank of 8 or more. Survival was analysed using Cox proportional hazards models with covariates updated at changes in cART regimen and with deaths up to 90 days after regimen cessation attributed to that regimen. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of analysis assumptions.

resultsAmong 5882 patients, 308 deaths occurred. The hazard ratio (HR) for neurocART use was 0.89 (P=0.35) when data were stratified by cohort and adjusted for age, mode of HIV exposure, hepatitis B virus coinfection, AIDS-defining illness, CD4 count (cells/μL) and regimen count. Sensitivity analyses showed similar nonsignificant results. We also examined a composite endpoint of AIDS-defining illness or death (HR=0.93; P=0.61), baseline regimen as neurocART (HR=0.95; P=0.69), CPE category (P=0.71) and prior neurocART duration (P=0.16). No association between CD4 cell count and neurocART use was observed (P=0.52).

conclusionsOur findings do not show a significant overall survival benefit associated with neurocART compared with cART. The potential benefit associated with neurocART in terms of prevention of neurocognitive impairment did not translate into an improvement in overall survival in this population. These findings were limited by the low incidence of associated mortality. Further studies and more extensive data are needed to address these limitations.

Indexed as

AdultAIDS Dementia ComplexAnti-HIV AgentsAustraliaCD4 Lymphocyte CountCentral Nervous SystemDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesSurvival AnalysisAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID21819527
PMCPMC3322175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.