Rationality and the genetic challenge revisited.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Let the Chips Fall! Public Nudging Arrangements, Coercion, and the Role of Independent Shopkeepers.Society · 2023
   Article
2. From species ethics to social concerns: Habermas's critique of "liberal eugenics" evaluated.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2014
   Article
3. The troubled identity of the bioethicist.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2013
   Article
4. Prenatal diagnosis as a tool and support for eugenics: myth or reality in contemporary French society?Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2013
   Article
5. Reasons, rationalities, and procreative beneficence: need Häyry stand politely by while Savulescu and Herissone-Kelly disagree?Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2011
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Guest editorial: On method and resolution in philosophical bioethics.2011

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as