Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21818695›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2011

BDDCS applied to over 900 drugs.

Leslie Z Benet, Fabio Broccatelli, Tudor I Oprea

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 201 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
201citing papers in PubMed
33.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

201 citing papers in PubMed, 617 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Aprepitant: Review on Solubility Enhancement.Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

141 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Leslie Z BenetDepartment of Bioengineering & Therapeutic Sciences, Schools of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 94143-0912, USA. leslie.benet@ucsf.edu
Fabio Broccatelli
Tudor I Oprea
University of California, San Francisco · USTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
PHARMACOGENETICS OF MEMBRANE TRANSPORTERSU01GM061390 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GIACOMINI, KATHLEEN M · 2000 to 2009
$29.2M
Pharmacogenomics of Membrane TransportersU19GM061390 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KWOK, PUI-YAN · 2010 to 2014
$16.3M
Yeast Biology ConsortiumU54MH084690 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI TEGOS, GEORGE P · 2008 to 2013
$14.4M
Transporter-Enzyme Interplay Evaluation via Microfluidiic HTS Cell Culture DeviceR21GM075900 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BENET, LESLIE Z · 2006 to 2008
$1.1M
Chemical Pattern Detection and Visualization in Biological NetworksR21GM095952 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI OPREA, TUDOR I · 2011 to 2012
$415k
NCI NIH HHS CA-118100NCI NIH HHS P30 CA118100NIGMS NIH HHS GM-095952NIGMS NIH HHS GM-61390NIGMS NIH HHS GM-75900NIGMS NIH HHS GM-90457NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM075900NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM095952NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM061390NIGMS NIH HHS U19 GM061390NIMH NIH HHS MH-084690NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH084690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we compile the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) classification for 927 drugs, which include 30 active metabolites. Of the 897 parent drugs, 78.8% (707) are administered orally. Where the lowest measured solubility is found, this value is reported for 72.7% (513) of these orally administered drugs and a dose number is recorded. The measured values are reported for percent excreted unchanged in urine, LogP, and LogD (7.4) when available. For all 927 compounds, the in silico parameters for predicted Log solubility in water, calculated LogP, polar surface area, and the number of hydrogen bond acceptors and hydrogen bond donors for the active moiety are also provided, thereby allowing comparison analyses for both in silico and experimentally measured values. We discuss the potential use of BDDCS to estimate the disposition characteristics of novel chemicals (new molecular entities) in the early stages of drug discovery and development. Transporter effects in the intestine and the liver are not clinically relevant for BDDCS class 1 drugs, but potentially can have a high impact for class 2 (efflux in the gut, and efflux and uptake in the liver) and class 3 (uptake and efflux in both gut and liver) drugs. A combination of high dose and low solubility is likely to cause BDDCS class 4 to be underpopulated in terms of approved drugs (N = 53 compared with over 200 each in classes 1-3). The influence of several measured and in silico parameters in the process of BDDCS category assignment is discussed in detail.

Indexed as

BiopharmaceuticsPharmacokineticsHydrogen BondingPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID21818695
PMCPMC3231854
OpenAlexW2034200280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.