Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21818668›Full record

SynthesisClinical orthopaedics and related research2012

Drivers of surgery for the degenerative hip, knee, and spine: a systematic review.

S Samuel Bederman, Charles D Rosen, Nitin N Bhatia, P Douglas Kiester, Ranjan Gupta

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Incidence of spine surgery in the South African private healthcare sector: ten-year trends within a large open medical scheme.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Trends in the surgical treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee in the United States.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S Samuel BedermanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Pavilion III, Orange, CA 92868, USA. sbederma@uci.edu
Charles D Rosen
Nitin N Bhatia
P Douglas Kiester
Ranjan Gupta

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical treatment for degenerative conditions of the hip, knee, and spine has an impact on overall healthcare spending. Surgical rates have increased dramatically and considerable regional variation has been observed. The reasons behind these increasing rates and variation across regions have not been well elucidated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore identified demographic (D), social structure (SS), health belief (HB), personal (PR) and community resources (CR), and medical need (MN) factors that drive rates of hip, knee, and spine surgery.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review to include all observational, population-based studies that compared surgical rates with potential drivers (D, SS, HB, PR, CR, MN). We searched PubMed combining key words focusing on (1) disease and procedure; (2) study methodology; and (3) explanatory models. Independent investigators selected potentially eligible studies from abstract review and abstracted methodological and outcome data. From an initial search of 256 articles, we found 37 to be potentially eligible (kappa 0.86) but only 28 met all our inclusion criteria.

resultsAge, nonminority, insurance coverage, and surgeon enthusiasm all increased surgical rates. Rates of arthroplasty were higher for females with higher education, income, obesity, rurality, willingness to consider surgery, and prevalence of disease, whereas spinal rates increased with male gender, lower income, and the availability of advanced imaging.

conclusionsRegional variation in these procedures exists because they are examples of preference-sensitive care. With strategies that may affect change in factors that are potentially modifiable by behavior or resources, extreme variation in rates may be reduced.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandAgedArthroplasty, ReplacementFemaleHip JointHumansInsurance, HealthKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsSpine

Identifiers

PMID21818668
PMCPMC3293963
OpenAlexW1968416004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.