ArticlePloS one2011
SPARC, FOXP3, CD8 and CD45 correlation with disease recurrence and long-term disease-free survival in colorectal cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of SPARC in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Prognostic Value of SPARC in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Tumour-infiltrating inflammation and prognosis in colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of cancer · 2014Pooled it
- The effect of immunonutrition on tumor infiltrative t lymphocytes and regulatory t cells in rectal tumor patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a prospective randomized clinical study.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2022Trial
- Pre-diagnostic Demographic, Lifestyle, and Health History Factors in Association with Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC) Expression in Colorectal Cancer Tissue.Biomarker insights · 2025Article
- Gene prediction of immune cells association between gut microbiota and colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive transcriptomic profiling of liver cancer identifies that histone and PTEN are major regulators of SCU‑induced antitumor activity.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Clinicopathological significance and prognostic role of LAG3 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in colorectal cancer; relationship with sidedness.Cancer cell international · 2023Article
- Identification of significant genes associated with prognosis of gastric cancer by bioinformatics analysis.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2022Article
- Intratumoral density of regulatory T cells is a predictor of host immune response and chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2022Article
- Identification of an immune overdrive high-risk subpopulation with aberrant expression of FOXP3 and CTLA4 in colorectal cancer.Oncogene · 2021Article
- Aberrant activation of the CD45-Wnt signaling axis promotes stemness and therapy resistance in colorectal cancer cells.Theranostics · 2021Article
- Genetic Variants in the Regulatory T cell-Related Pathway and Colorectal Cancer Prognosis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020Article
- Regulatory T cells and cytotoxic T cells close to the epithelial-stromal interface are associated with a favorable prognosis.Oncoimmunology · 2020Article
- Identification of key genes involved in the development and progression of early-onset colorectal cancer by co-expression network analysis.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Article
- The interaction between SPARC and GRP78 interferes with ER stress signaling and potentiates apoptosis via PERK/eIF2α and IRE1α/XBP-1 in colorectal cancer.Cell death & disease · 2019Article
- Association of SPARC gene polymorphisms rs3210714 and rs7719521 with VEGF expression and utility of Nottingham Prognostic Index scoring in breast cancer in a sample of Egyptian women.Molecular biology reports · 2018Article
- Immune regulation and anti-cancer activity by lipid inflammatory mediators.International immunopharmacology · 2018Review
- Prognostic significance of tumor genotypes and CD8+ infiltrates in stage I-III colorectal cancer.Oncotarget · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSPARC is a matricellular protein involved in tissue remodelling, cell migration and angiogenesis, while forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) protein functions as a transcription factor involved in immune cell regulation. Both SPARC and FOXP3 can play an anti-tumorigenic role in cancer progression. The aim was to determine if SPARC, FOXP3, CD8 and CD45RO expression levels are associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) stage, disease outcome and long-term cancer-specific survival (CSS) in stage II and III CRC. METHODS AND
findingsSPARC expression was initially assessed in 120 paired normal and stage I-IV CRCs. Subsequently, approximately 1000 paired patient samples of stage II or III CRCs in tissue microarrays were stained for SPARC, FOXP3, CD8 or CD45RO. Proportional hazards modelling assessed correlations between these markers and clinicopathological data, including disease outcome and cancer specific survival (CSS). Both SPARC and FOXP3 expression were significantly greater in CRC than normal colon (p<0.0001). High SPARC expression correlated with good disease outcome (≥60 mths without disease recurrence, p = 0.0039) and better long-term CSS in stage II CRC (<0.0001). In stage III CRC, high SPARC expression correlated with better long-term CSS (p<0.0001) and less adjuvant chemotherapy use (p = 0.01). High FOXP3 correlated with a good disease outcome, better long-term CSS and less adjuvant chemotherapy use in stage II (p<0.0037, <0.0001 and p = 0.04 respectively), but not in stage III CRC. High CD8 and CD45RO expression correlated with better disease outcome in stage II CRC, and better CSS, but the differences were not as marked as for SPARC and FOXP3.
conclusionsThese data suggest that high SPARC and FOXP3 are associated with better disease outcome in stage II CRC and may be prognostic indicators of CSS. Further assessment of whether these markers predict patients at high risk of recurrence with stage II CRC and functional studies of these effects are underway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.