Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21816951›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2011

The use of mouse models to understand and improve cognitive deficits in Down syndrome.

Ishita Das, Roger H Reeves

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Review of Clinical Trials in Down Syndrome.International review of research in developmental disabilities · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Oxidative Stress in Trisomy 21 Phenotype.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Underlying Relationship between Keratoconus and Down Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Behavioral Phenotyping for Down Syndrome in Mice.Current protocols in mouse biology · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Airway Ciliary Beating Affected by theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Down syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ishita DasDepartment of Physiology and McKusick-Nathans, Institute for Medical Genetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Roger H Reeves
Johns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

GENOMIC APPROACHES TO ANEUPLOIDYR01HD038384 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI REEVES, ROGER H · 2000 to 2020
$11.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD038384NICHD NIH HHS R01HD038384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remarkable advances have been made in recent years towards therapeutics for cognitive impairment in individuals with Down syndrome (DS) by using mouse models. In this review, we briefly describe the phenotypes of mouse models that represent outcome targets for drug testing, the behavioral tests used to assess impairments in cognition and the known mechanisms of action of several drugs that are being used in preclinical studies or are likely to be tested in clinical trials. Overlaps in the distribution of targets and in the pathways that are affected by these diverse drugs in the trisomic brain suggest new avenues for DS research and drug development.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainClinical Trials as TopicCognition DisordersDown SyndromeHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID21816951
PMCPMC3180223
OpenAlexW2126309093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.