ED in APL: tip of the iceberg?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Scoring System for disseminated intravascular coagulation ≥ 6: a new predictor of hemorrhagic early death in acute promyelocytic leukemia.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2013
   Article
2. The results of the International Consortium on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: a 'proof of concept' of networking as a strategy to improve the outcome of treatment of hematological malignancies in developing countries.Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Early death rate in acute promyelocytic leukemia remains high despite all-trans retinoic acid.2011

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.