SynthesisMalaria journal2011
The architecture and effect of participation: a systematic review of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination. Implications for malaria elimination.
Synthesis in Malaria journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
129 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 233 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of natural predators, microbial bioinsecticides, and plant-based bioinsecticides to reduce mosquito-borne disease burden: a systematic review.Journal of medical entomology · 2026Pooled it
- Community engagement processes in low- and middle-income countries health research settings: a systematic review of the literature.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Mosquito aquatic habitat modification and manipulation interventions to control malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review of individual and community mitigation measures for prevention and control of chikungunya virus.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic review of factors that shape implementation of mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis in sub-Saharan Africa.BMC public health · 2017Pooled it
- Community engagement and population coverage in mass anti-malarial administrations: a systematic literature review.Malaria journal · 2016Pooled it
- Which intervention design factors influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review.Health policy and planning · 2015Pooled it
- Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Community engagement among forest goers in a malaria prophylaxis trial: implementation challenges and implications.Malaria journal · 2023Trial
- Cost of community-led larval source management and house improvement for malaria control: a cost analysis within a cluster-randomized trial in a rural district in Malawi.Malaria journal · 2021Trial
- Community perspectives on treating asymptomatic infections for malaria elimination in The Gambia.Malaria journal · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Assessment of the effect of larval source management and house improvement on malaria transmission when added to standard malaria control strategies in southern Malawi: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial.BMC infectious diseases · 2017Trial
- Effects of malaria volunteer training on coverage and timeliness of diagnosis: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Myanmar.Malaria journal · 2012Trial
- Community perceptions, trust, and experiences of malaria clinical research and participation in rural Cambodia.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Understanding community and health system acceptability, readiness and perspectives on the introduction of new vector control approaches for malaria control in Papua New Guinea.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Inclusiveness of social participation for health reform: findings from a realist review.International journal for equity in health · 2026Review
- Large-Scale Deployment of Lehmann's Funnel Entry Traps to Control Malaria Mosquito Populations.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunity engagement and participation has played a critical role in successful disease control and elimination campaigns in many countries. Despite this, its benefits for malaria control and elimination are yet to be fully realized. This may be due to a limited understanding of the influences on participation in developing countries as well as inadequate investment in infrastructure and resources to support sustainable community participation. This paper reports the findings of an atypical systematic review of 60 years of literature in order to arrive at a more comprehensive awareness of the constructs of participation for communicable disease control and elimination and provide guidance for the current malaria elimination campaign.
methodsEvidence derived from quantitative research was considered both independently and collectively with qualitative research papers and case reports. All papers included in the review were systematically coded using a pre-determined qualitative coding matrix that identified influences on community participation at the individual, household, community and government/civil society levels. Colour coding was also carried out to reflect the key primary health care period in which community participation programmes originated. These processes allowed exhaustive content analysis and synthesis of data in an attempt to realize conceptual development beyond that able to be achieved by individual empirical studies or case reports.
resultsOf the 60 papers meeting the selection criteria, only four studies attempted to determine the effect of community participation on disease transmission. Due to inherent differences in their design, interventions and outcome measures, results could not be compared. However, these studies showed statistically significant reductions in disease incidence or prevalence using various forms of community participation. The use of locally selected volunteers provided with adequate training, supervision and resources are common and important elements of the success of the interventions in these studies. In addition, qualitative synthesis of all 60 papers elucidates the complex architecture of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination which is presented herein.
conclusionsThe current global malaria elimination campaign calls for a health systems strengthening approach to provide an enabling environment for programmes in developing countries. In order to realize the benefits of this approach it is vital to provide adequate investment in the 'people' component of health systems and understand the multi-level factors that influence their participation. The challenges of strengthening this component of health systems are discussed, as is the importance of ensuring that current global malaria elimination efforts do not derail renewed momentum towards the comprehensive primary health care approach. It is recommended that the application of the results of this systematic review be considered for other diseases of poverty in order to harmonize efforts at building 'competent communities' for communicable disease control and optimising health system effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.