Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21816067›Full record

Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2011

The prone 12 o'clock position reduces ileal intubation time during colonoscopy compared to the left lateral 6 o'clock (standard) position.

Arjuna P De Silva, Ravindu S Kumarasena, Suramya D Perera Keragala, Udaya Kalubowila, Madunil Niriella, Anuradha S Dassanayake, Arunasalam Pathmeswaran, H Janaka de Silva

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03337217 (Colonoscopy in the Prone Position for Patients With BMI Greater Than 30 Is Superior to Standard Left Lateral Decubitus Position), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03337217 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Colonoscopy in the Prone Position for Patients With BMI Greater Than 30 Is Superior to Standard Left Lateral Decubitus Position

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2017 to 2019Enrolled141ConditionsObesityArmsPosition during colonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Patient Position in Operative Endoscopy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Colonoscopy procedural skills and training for new beginners.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arjuna P De SilvaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka. apdsilva@yahoo.com
Ravindu S Kumarasena
Suramya D Perera Keragala
Udaya Kalubowila
Madunil Niriella
Anuradha S Dassanayake
Arunasalam Pathmeswaran
H Janaka de Silva

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIleal intubation is the gold standard for a complete colonoscopy. However, despite evidence of clinical benefit ileoscopy is not always attempted due to perceived technical difficulty. Our aim was to compare time taken for ileal intubation using a new position-the prone 12 o'clock position (PP) with the standard method (left lateral 6 o'clock position-LLP).

methodsWe performed a pilot study using fluoroscopy to determine the best patient position for ileal intubation. This was the prone 12 o'clock position. Patients were colonoscoped in the left lateral position and then randomized to ileal intubation in the 6 o'clock position(LL) or the 12 o'clock (PP) position.

results202 consecutive patients were referred for colonoscopy. Colonoscopy was performed on 150 patients [82 females, mean (SD) age 53 (16) years]. 75 patients were randomized for ileal intubation in the PP and 75 patients in the LLP. Overall, the ileum was successfully intubated in 145 (96%) patients [74 (98.7%) in the PP and 71 (94.7%) in the LLP]. The median (Interquartile Range) ileal intubation time was 12 (10) seconds in the PP and 87 (82) seconds in the LLP (p < 0.0001; Mann-Whitney U test). The ileum was abnormal in 11 (7.5%) patients.

conclusionsDuring colonoscopy, the prone 12 o'clock position gives a more direct approach to the ileo-caecal valve and significantly reduces ileal intubation time.

trial registrationTRIAL REGISTRY: Sri Lanka Clinical Trial Registry Clinical trial registry number: SLCTR/2009/002.

Indexed as

IntubationProne PositionAdultAgedColonoscopyFemaleFluoroscopyHumansIleumMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID21816067
PMCPMC3160404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.