Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21816037›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011

Strategies for aggregating gene expression data: the collapseRows R function.

Jeremy A Miller, Chaochao Cai, Peter Langfelder, Daniel H Geschwind, Sunil M Kurian, Daniel R Salomon, Steve Horvath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 199 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
199citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

199 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 313 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

139 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy A MillerInterdepartmental Program for Neuroscience, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Chaochao Cai
Peter Langfelder
Daniel H Geschwind
Sunil M Kurian
Daniel R Salomon
Steve Horvath
University of California, Los Angeles · USScripps Research Institute · USUCLA Health · US

Funding

ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE INTIMA IN EARLY LESION FORMATIONP01HL030568 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FOGELMAN, ALAN M · 1985 to 2019
$55.2M
UCLA SPORE IN PROSTATE CANCERP50CA092131 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FREEMAN, MICHAEL R · 2002 to 2023
$42.6M
Quantitative Biology CoreU19AI063603 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI KWOK, PUI-YAN · 2004 to 2015
$26.4M
Novel Genetic Risk Factors for Alzheimer's Disease (AD) & Frontotemporal DementiaR01AG026938 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GESCHWIND, DANIEL H · 2005 to 2009
$2.5M
A gene expression study of regional vulnerability in Alzheimer's diseaseF31AG031649 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MILLER, JEREMY A · 2007 to 2009
$90k
NCI NIH HHS P50CA092131NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL030568NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI063603-07NIA NIH HHS F31 AG031649NIA NIH HHS R01 AG26938-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic and other high dimensional analyses often require one to summarize multiple related variables by a single representative. This task is also variously referred to as collapsing, combining, reducing, or aggregating variables. Examples include summarizing several probe measurements corresponding to a single gene, representing the expression profiles of a co-expression module by a single expression profile, and aggregating cell-type marker information to de-convolute expression data. Several standard statistical summary techniques can be used, but network methods also provide useful alternative methods to find representatives. Currently few collapsing functions are developed and widely applied.

resultsWe introduce the R function collapseRows that implements several collapsing methods and evaluate its performance in three applications. First, we study a crucial step of the meta-analysis of microarray data: the merging of independent gene expression data sets, which may have been measured on different platforms. Toward this end, we collapse multiple microarray probes for a single gene and then merge the data by gene identifier. We find that choosing the probe with the highest average expression leads to best between-study consistency. Second, we study methods for summarizing the gene expression profiles of a co-expression module. Several gene co-expression network analysis applications show that the optimal collapsing strategy depends on the analysis goal. Third, we study aggregating the information of cell type marker genes when the aim is to predict the abundance of cell types in a tissue sample based on gene expression data ("expression deconvolution"). We apply different collapsing methods to predict cell type abundances in peripheral human blood and in mixtures of blood cell lines. Interestingly, the most accurate prediction method involves choosing the most highly connected "hub" marker gene. Finally, to facilitate biological interpretation of collapsed gene lists, we introduce the function userListEnrichment, which assesses the enrichment of gene lists for known brain and blood cell type markers, and for other published biological pathways.

conclusionsThe R function collapseRows implements several standard and network-based collapsing methods. In various genomic applications we provide evidence that both types of methods are robust and biologically relevant tools.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAnimalsBloodBrainGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Identifiers

PMID21816037
PMCPMC3166942
OpenAlexW2072245877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.