Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21815821›Full record

ArticlePopulation health management2012

Community engagement about genetic variation research.

Sharon F Terry, Kurt D Christensen, Susan Metosky, Gayle Rudofsky, Kathleen P Deignan, Hulda Martinez, Penelope Johnson-Moore, Toby Citrin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population health management, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The reported impact of public involvement in biobanks: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  4. Citizen Scientists as Human Subjects: Ethical Issues.Citizen science : theory and practice · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sharon F TerryGenetic Alliance, 4301 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 404, Washington, DC 20008, USA. sterry@geneticalliance.org
Kurt D Christensen
Susan Metosky
Gayle Rudofsky
Kathleen P Deignan
Hulda Martinez
Penelope Johnson-Moore
Toby Citrin

Funding

GENOME TECHNOLOGY &REPRODUCTION--VALUES &PUBLIC POLICYR01HG001005 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CITRIN, TOBY · 1995 to 2003
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS 2 R01 HG01005-01NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG001005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this article is to describe the methods and effectiveness of the Public Engagement in Genetic Variation and Haplotype Mapping Issues (PEGV) Project, which engaged a community in policy discussion about genetic variation research. The project implemented a 6-stage community engagement model in New Rochelle, New York. First, researchers recruited community partners. Second, the project team created community oversight. Third, focus groups discussed concerns generated by genetic variation research. Fourth, community dialogue sessions addressed focus group findings and developed policy recommendations. Fifth, a conference was held to present these policy recommendations and to provide a forum for HapMap (haplotype mapping) researchers to dialogue directly with residents. Finally, findings were disseminated via presentations and papers to the participants and to the wider community beyond. The project generated a list of proposed guidelines for genetic variation research that addressed the concerns of New Rochelle residents. Project team members expressed satisfaction with the engagement model overall but expressed concerns about how well community groups were utilized and what segment of the community actually engaged in the project. The PEGV Project represents a model for researchers to engage the general public in policy development about genetic research. There are benefits of such a process beyond the desired genetic research.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsGenetic VariationHapMap ProjectAdolescentAdultAdvisory CommitteesAgedAged, 80 and overCongresses as TopicFemaleFocus GroupsGenetics, PopulationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew York

Identifiers

PMID21815821
PMCPMC3363293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.