ArticleImmunologic research2011
The genetic profiling of preferentially expressed genes in murine splenic CD8α+ dendritic cells.
Article in Immunologic research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the murine splenocytes, CD8α+ dendritic cells (abbreviated as 8+DC) and CD8α- dendritic cells (abbreviated as 8-DC) are identified with some vague features for each of them. 8+DCs but not 8-DCs cross-prime cytotoxic T cells in vivo. We aim to distinguish the two subtypes of DC based on gene expression profiling. Suppressive subtractive hybridization was undertaken to get differentially expressed genes from such subtracted cDNA library specific to 8+DC. A total of 114 sequences from the subtracted cDNA library specific to 8+DC library were analyzed. Most of them are known proteins, but some of them were novel, either totally novel genes or homologs to known genes, but with novel exon. About 55 probably novel exons were discovered, and 11 exons had longer length than those in gene bank. The clones 12, 44, 79, and 110 have no match with known sequences in gene bank. Then, semi-quantitative PCR was done to compare the expression of the enriched sequences between 8+DC and 8-DC. About 14 genes are differentially expressed in 8+DC. Therefore, SSH is an effective method to clone differentially expressed genes for 8+DC compared to 8-DC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21814860What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.