Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21814459›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2011

Long-acting β-adrenoceptor agonists in the management of COPD: focus on indacaterol.

Jutta Beier, Kai M Beeh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Indacaterol improves daily physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2013
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. COPD: maximization of bronchodilation.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jutta Beierinsaf Respiratory Research Institute, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Kai M Beeh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bronchodilators are the cornerstone of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment to improve airflow, symptoms, exercise tolerance, and exacerbations. There is convincing evidence that regular treatment with long-acting bronchodilators is more effective and convenient than treatment with short-acting bronchodilators. Long-acting β-2-agonists include the twice-daily drugs formoterol and salmeterol and, more recently, once-daily indacaterol. Studies with head-to-head comparisons of long-acting bronchodilators are scant, but novel data from controlled trials with the once-daily β(2)-agonist indacaterol indicate superior bronchodilation and clinical efficacy of indacaterol at recommended doses over twice-daily long-acting β(2)-agonists, and at least equipotent bronchodilation compared with once-daily tiotropium. The recent therapeutic developments in COPD underscore a shift from short-acting bronchodilators with multiple dosings per day to reduced dosing frequency and prolonged duration of action, including once-daily treatment, with more consistent effects on various clinical outcomes. This review summarizes relevant clinical data for twice-daily β-2-agonists in COPD, and further focuses on novel data for once-daily indacaterol, including head-to-head comparison trials.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsDrug Administration ScheduleEvidence-Based MedicineHumansIndansLungPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuinolonesTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsindacaterolIndansQuinolonesbronchodilatorsCOPDformoterolindacaterolpharmacologysalmeteroltherapytiotropium

Identifiers

PMID21814459
PMCPMC3144843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.