Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21813775›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2011

The requirement for potent adjuvants to enhance the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of protein vaccines can be overcome by prior immunization with a recombinant adenovirus.

Simone C de Cassan, Emily K Forbes, Alexander D Douglas, Anita Milicic, Bijender Singh, Puneet Gupta, Virander S Chauhan, Chetan E Chitnis, Sarah C Gilbert, Adrian V S Hill and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Modular capsid decoration boosts adenovirus vaccine-induced humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Functional Comparison of Blood-StageFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simone C de CassanThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom. simone.decassan@ndm.ox.ac.uk
Emily K Forbes
Alexander D Douglas
Anita Milicic
Bijender Singh
Puneet Gupta
Virander S Chauhan
Chetan E Chitnis
Sarah C Gilbert
Adrian V S Hill
Simon J Draper
University of Oxford · GBInternational Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · IN

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000527Medical Research Council G1000527(95710)Wellcome Trust 076438Wellcome Trust 084113Wellcome Trust 084113/Z/07/ZWellcome Trust 090532Wellcome Trust 095540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central goal in vaccinology is the induction of high and sustained Ab responses. Protein-in-adjuvant formulations are commonly used to achieve such responses. However, their clinical development can be limited by the reactogenicity of some of the most potent preclinical adjuvants and the cost and complexity of licensing new adjuvants for human use. Also, few adjuvants induce strong cellular immunity, which is important for protection against many diseases, such as malaria. We compared classical adjuvants such as aluminum hydroxide to new preclinical adjuvants and adjuvants in clinical development, such as Abisco 100, CoVaccine HT, Montanide ISA720, and stable emulsion-glucopyranosyl lipid A, for their ability to induce high and sustained Ab responses and T cell responses. These adjuvants induced a broad range of Ab responses when used in a three-shot protein-in-adjuvant regimen using the model Ag OVA and leading blood-stage malaria vaccine candidate Ags. Surprisingly, this range of Ab immunogenicity was greatly reduced when a protein-in-adjuvant vaccine was used to boost Ab responses primed by a human adenovirus serotype 5 vaccine recombinant for the same Ag. This human adenovirus serotype 5-protein regimen also induced a more cytophilic Ab response and demonstrated improved efficacy of merozoite surface protein-1 protein vaccines against a Plasmodium yoelii blood-stage challenge. This indicates that the differential immunogenicity of protein vaccine adjuvants may be largely overcome by prior immunization with recombinant adenovirus, especially for adjuvants that are traditionally considered poorly immunogenic in the context of subunit vaccination and may circumvent the need for more potent chemical adjuvants.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleImmunoglobulin GMalaria VaccinesMerozoite Surface Protein 1MiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLVaccinationAdjuvants, ImmunologicImmunoglobulin GMalaria VaccinesMerozoite Surface Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID21813775
PMCPMC3160495
OpenAlexW2147803077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.