Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21813721›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011

Evaluation of six commercial nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and other Neisseria species.

Sepehr N Tabrizi, Magnus Unemo, Athena E Limnios, Tiffany R Hogan, Stig-Ove Hjelmevoll, Susanne M Garland, John Tapsall

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02870101 (Performance of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for the Detection of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia Trachomatis in Extragenital Sites), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02870101 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Performance of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for the Detection of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia Trachomatis in Extragenital Sites

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled2,767ConditionsNeisseria Gonorrhoeae Infection, Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection, Sexually Transmitted InfectionsArmsNucleic acid amplification test 1 for NG and CT, Nucleic acid amplification test 2 for NG and CT, Nucleic acid amplification test 3 for NG and CT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. To culture or not to culture: correlatingSexually transmitted infections · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A novel commensalJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Genomic analysis of aASM case reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Incidence and Duration of Pharyngeal Chlamydia Among a Cohort of Men Who Have Sex With Men.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  14. The Natural History of Rectal Gonococcal and Chlamydial Infections: The ExGen Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Second- and third-generation commercial Neisseria gonorrhoeae screening assays and the ongoing issues of false-positive results and confirmatory testing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Point-by-Point Progress: Gonorrhea Point of Care Tests.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sepehr N TabriziDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, Bio 21 Institute, Parkville 3052, Australia. sepehr.tabrizi@thewomens.org.au
Magnus Unemo
Athena E Limnios
Tiffany R Hogan
Stig-Ove Hjelmevoll
Susanne M Garland
John Tapsall

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extragenital samples may result in false-positive results due to cross-reaction with commensal Neisseria species or Neisseria meningitidis. This study examined 450 characterized clinical culture isolates, comprising 216 N. gonorrhoeae isolates and 234 isolates of nongonococcal Neisseria species (n = 218) and 16 isolates of other closely related bacteria, with six commercial nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). The six NAATs tested were Gen-Probe APTIMA COMBO 2 and APTIMA GC, Roche COBAS Amplicor CT/NG and COBAS 4800 CT/NG tests, BD ProbeTec GC Qx amplified DNA assay, and Abbott RealTime CT/NG test. All assays except COBAS Amplicor CT/NG test where four (1.9%) isolates were not detected showed a positive result with all N. gonorrhoeae isolates (n = 216). Among the 234 nongonococcal isolates examined, initial results from all assays displayed some false-positive results due to cross-reactions. Specifically, the COBAS Amplicor and ProbeTec tests showed the highest number of false-positive results, detecting 33 (14.1%) and 26 (11%) nongonococcal Neisseria isolates, respectively. On the first testing, APTIMA COMBO 2, APTIMA GC, Abbott RealTime, and Roche COBAS 4800 showed lower level of cross-reactions with five (2.1%), four (1.7%), two (1%), and two (1%) of the isolates showing low-level positivity, respectively. Upon retesting of these nine nongonococcal isolates using freshly cultured colonies, none were positive by the APTIMA COMBO 2, Abbott RealTime, or COBAS 4800 test. In conclusion, the COBAS Amplicor and ProbeTec tests displayed high number of false-positive results, while the remaining NAATs showed only sporadic low-level false-positive results. Supplementary testing for confirmation of N. gonorrhoeae NAATs remains recommended with all samples tested, in particular those from extragenital sites.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesFalse Positive ReactionsHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNeisseriaNeisseriaceae InfectionsNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID21813721
PMCPMC3187337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.