Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21813710›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology2011

Contribution of Kv2.1 channels to the delayed rectifier current in freshly dispersed smooth muscle cells from rabbit urethra.

B Kyle, E Bradley, S Ohya, G P Sergeant, N G McHale, K D Thornbury, M A Hollywood

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Igniting CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  2. The intracellular CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Ion channels of the mammalian urethra.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

B KyleSmooth Muscle Research Centre, Dundalk Institute of Technology, Dundalk, Ireland.
E Bradley
S Ohya
G P Sergeant
N G McHale
K D Thornbury
M A Hollywood
Dundalk Institute of Technology · IENagoya City University · JP

Funding

Myogenic tone in the urethra and its modulationR01DK068565 · NIDDK · DUNDALK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HOLLYWOOD, MARK A · 2005 to 2009
$1.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK068565NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK-68565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have characterized the native voltage-dependent K(+) (K(v)) current in rabbit urethral smooth muscle cells (RUSMC) and compared its pharmacological and biophysical properties with K(v)2.1 and K(v)2.2 channels cloned from the rabbit urethra and stably expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells (HEK(Kv2.1) and HEK(Kv2.2)). RUSMC were perfused with Hanks' solution at 37°C and studied using the patch-clamp technique with K(+)-rich pipette solutions. Cells were bathed in 100 nM Penitrem A (Pen A) to block large-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) (BK) currents and depolarized to +40 mV for 500 ms to evoke K(v) currents. These were unaffected by margatoxin, κ-dendrotoxin, or α-dendrotoxin (100 nM, n = 3-5) but were blocked by stromatoxin-1 (ScTx, IC(50) ∼130 nM), consistent with the idea that the currents were carried through K(v)2 channels. RNA was detected for K(v)2.1, K(v)2.2, and the silent subunit K(v)9.3 in urethral smooth muscle. Immunocytochemistry showed membrane staining for both K(v)2 subtypes and K(v)9.3 in isolated RUSMC. HEK(Kv2.1) and HEK(Kv2.2) currents were blocked in a concentration-dependent manner by ScTx, with estimated IC(50) values of ∼150 nM (K(v)2.1, n = 5) and 70 nM (K(v)2.2, n = 6). The mean half-maximal voltage (V(1/2)) of inactivation of the USMC K(v) current was -56 ± 3 mV (n = 9). This was similar to the HEK(Kv2.1) current (-55 ± 3 mV, n = 13) but significantly different from the HEK(Kv2.2) currents (-30 ± 3 mV, n = 11). Action potentials (AP) evoked from RUSMC studied under current-clamp mode were unaffected by ScTx. However, when ScTx was applied in the presence of Pen A, the AP duration was significantly prolonged. Similarly, ScTx increased the amplitude of spontaneous contractions threefold, but only after Pen A application. These data suggest that K(v)2.1 channels contribute significantly to the K(v) current in RUSMC.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansMaleMembrane PotentialsMuscle, SmoothMycotoxinsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPeptidesRabbitsScorpion VenomsShab Potassium ChannelsSnake VenomsSpider Venomsdendrotoxin Adendrotoxin KmargatoxinMycotoxinsPeptidesScorpion VenomsShab Potassium ChannelsSnake VenomsSpider Venomsstromatoxin protein, Stromatopelma calceatatremortin

Identifiers

PMID21813710
PMCPMC3213918
OpenAlexW2117025083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.