Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21813676›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2011

Pool-specific regulation of motor neuron survival by neurotrophic support.

Fabienne Lamballe, Matthieu Genestine, Nathalie Caruso, Vilma Arce, Sylvie Richelme, Françoise Helmbacher, Flavio Maina

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fibroblast-derivedeLife · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. HGF and MET: From Brain Development to Neurological Disorders.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Characterization ofFrontiers in genetics · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fabienne LamballeDevelopmental Biology Institute of Marseille-Luminy (IBDML), UMR 6216, CNRS-Inserm-Université de la Méditerranée, Campus de Luminy-Case 907, 13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France.
Matthieu Genestine
Nathalie Caruso
Vilma Arce
Sylvie Richelme
Françoise Helmbacher
Flavio Maina
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRInstitut de Biologie du Développement Marseille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precise control of motor neuron (MN) death and survival following initial innervation of skeletal muscle targets is a key step in sculpting a functional motor system, but how this is regulated at the level of individual motor pools remains unclear. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its receptor Met play key developmental roles in both muscle and MNs. We generated mice (termed "Nes-Met") in which met is inactivated from midembryonic stages onward in the CNS only. Adult animals showed motor behavioral defects suggestive of impaired innervation of pectoral muscles. Correspondingly, in neonatal spinal cords of Nes-Met mutants, we observed death of a discrete population of pea3-expressing MNs at brachial levels. Axonal tracing using pea3 reporter mice revealed a novel target muscle of pea3-expressing MNs: the pectoralis minor muscle. In Nes-Met mice, the pectoralis minor pool initially innervated its target muscle, but required HGF/Met for survival, hence for proper maintenance of muscle innervation. In contrast, HGF/Met was dispensable for the survival of neighboring Met-expressing MN pools, despite its earlier functions for their specification and axon growth. Our results demonstrate the exquisite degree to which outcomes of signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases are regulated on a cell-by-cell basis. They also provide a model for one way in which the multiplicity of neurotrophic factors may allow for regulation of MN numbers in a pool-specific manner.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAxonsCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCholine O-AcetyltransferaseCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitDose-Response Relationship, DrugEmbryo, MammalianGanglia, SpinalGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHand StrengthHepatocyte Growth FactorIntermediate Filament ProteinsCholine O-AcetyltransferaseCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitEtv4 protein, mouseGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHepatocyte Growth FactorIntermediate Filament ProteinsNerve Growth FactorsNerve Tissue ProteinsNes protein, mouseNestinProto-Oncogene Proteins c-etsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metRunx1 protein, mousetranscription factor PEA3Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21813676
PMCPMC6623376
OpenAlexW2109745752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.