SynthesisAIDS and behavior2011
Social network-based interventions to promote condom use: a systematic review.
Synthesis in AIDS and behavior, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The key design features and effectiveness of social network interventions for HIV testing and linkage services in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Pooled it
- Social network interventions for health behaviours and outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Use of social network analysis in the development, dissemination, implementation, and sustainability of health behavior interventions for adults: A systematic review.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2019Pooled it
- Structural and community-level interventions for increasing condom use to prevent the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Examining the social and behavioral dynamics of substance use in a longitudinal network study in rural Appalachia.Addictive behaviors · 2024Article
- Let's Talk About Condoms: Social Engagement in a Sexual Health Intervention Targeting Young Adults in Denmark.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2024Article
- Deep learning and social network analysis elucidate drivers of HIV transmission in a high-incidence cohort of people who inject drugs.Science advances · 2022Article
- Social network and HIV/AIDS: A bibliometric analysis of global literature.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Protocol: Mapping social networks, social influence and sexual health among youth in rural KwaZulu-Natal, the Sixhumene cohort study.Wellcome open research · 2022Article
- Social network interventions in the space of topological relationships between communities.Social network analysis and mining · 2022Article
- Cervical cancer screening programme attendance and compliance predictors regarding Colombia's Amazon region.PloS one · 2022Article
- Privacy and Confidentiality Considerations for Collecting HIV Risk Network Data among Men who Have Sex with Men and Implications for Constructing Valid Risk Networks.Social networks · 2021Article
- Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Sexual health norms and communication patterns within the close social networks of men who have sex with men and transgender women in Lima, Peru: a 2017 cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Sexual Health Influencer Distribution of HIV/Syphilis Self-Tests Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: Secondary Analysis to Inform Community-Based Interventions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Using Social Networks to Understand and Overcome Implementation Barriers in the Global HIV Response.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019Review
- Progreso en Salud: Findings from Two Adapted Social Network HIV Risk Reduction Interventions for Latina Seasonal Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Study Protocol: 6th National Survey of Australian Secondary Students and Adolescent Sexual Health, 2018.Frontiers in public health · 2019Article
- Spatial Distribution of Partner-Seeking Men Who Have Sex With Men Using Geosocial Networking Apps: Epidemiologic Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness of the Homework Intervention Strategy (eHIS) Program to Enhance Male Condom Use: Research Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective sexually transmitted infection (STIs)/HIV prevention programs are urgently needed, but translating evidence-based methods of STI/HIV prevention into sustainable programs has been difficult. Social influences are critical for establishing condom use norms. This study systematically reviewed social network-based interventions focused on condom promotion. Social networks were defined as groups who self-identified prior to the research study. Eleven eligible research studies were identified and included in this review. Only three studies measured biological endpoints and five studies used validated measures of condom use. Among the nine studies with control groups, eight showed significant improvements in at least one measure of condom use. There were large differences in how social network members were identified and involved in the interventions. This systematic review highlights the potential utility of social network-based condom promotion programs. More research is needed to show how these promising studies can be expanded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.