Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21811648›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2011

A screen against Leishmania intracellular amastigotes: comparison to a promastigote screen and identification of a host cell-specific hit.

Geraldine De Muylder, Kenny K H Ang, Steven Chen, Michelle R Arkin, Juan C Engel, James H McKerrow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biomedicines · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of Beauvericin's activity and mode of action against all life stages ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Promising Antileishmanial Activity ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Imidazo[1,2-ACS omega · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Novel Schiff bases of Vanillin: potent inhibitors of macrophage harboredJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geraldine De MuylderDepartment of Pathology, Sandler Center for Drug Discovery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America. Geraldine.DeMuylder@ucsf.edu
Kenny K H Ang
Steven Chen
Michelle R Arkin
Juan C Engel
James H McKerrow
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Lead Identification to Clinical Candidate Selection: Drugs for Chagas DiseaseR01AI090605 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MCKERROW, JAMES H. · 2010 to 2014
$5.5M
NIAID NIH HHS AI090605NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI090605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to screen compounds in a high-throughput manner is essential in the process of small molecule drug discovery. Critical to the success of screening strategies is the proper design of the assay, often implying a compromise between ease/speed and a biologically relevant setting. Leishmaniasis is a major neglected disease with limited therapeutic options. In order to streamline efforts for the design of productive drug screens against Leishmania, we compared the efficiency of two screening methods, one targeting the free living and easily cultured promastigote (insect-infective) stage, the other targeting the clinically relevant but more difficult to culture intra-macrophage amastigote (mammal-infective) stage. Screening of a 909-member library of bioactive compounds against Leishmania donovani revealed 59 hits in the promastigote primary screen and 27 in the intracellular amastigote screen, with 26 hits shared by both screens. This suggested that screening against the promastigote stage, although more suitable for automation, fails to identify all active compounds and leads to numerous false positive hits. Of particular interest was the identification of one compound specific to the infective amastigote stage of the parasite. This compound affects intracellular but not axenic parasites, suggesting a host cell-dependent mechanism of action, opening new avenues for anti-leishmanial chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsCell Line, TumorDrug DiscoveryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansLeishmaniaLeishmaniasisLife Cycle StagesMacrophagesNaloxoneSmall Molecule LibrariesAntiprotozoal AgentsnaloxonazineNaloxoneSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID21811648
PMCPMC3139667
OpenAlexW2120307572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.