Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21811581›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

The action mechanism of the Myc inhibitor termed Omomyc may give clues on how to target Myc for cancer therapy.

Mauro Savino, Daniela Annibali, Nicoletta Carucci, Emilia Favuzzi, Michael D Cole, Gerard I Evan, Laura Soucek, Sergio Nasi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Myc beyond Cancer: Regulation of Mammalian Tissue Regeneration.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mauro SavinoConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche--Istituto di Biologia e Patologia Molecolari (CNR-IBPM), Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università Sapienza, Roma, Italia.
Daniela Annibali
Nicoletta Carucci
Emilia Favuzzi
Michael D Cole
Gerard I Evan
Laura Soucek
Sergio Nasi
Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology · ITPrinceton University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology

Funding

FUNCTION OF THE C-MYC ONCOGENER01CA055248 · NCI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI COLE, MICHAEL DAVID · 1992 to 2020
$8.6M
Cancer Research UK 12077NCI NIH HHS R01 CA055248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence points to Myc--a multifaceted bHLHZip transcription factor deregulated in the majority of human cancers--as a priority target for therapy. How to target Myc is less clear, given its involvement in a variety of key functions in healthy cells. Here we report on the action mechanism of the Myc interfering molecule termed Omomyc, which demonstrated astounding therapeutic efficacy in transgenic mouse cancer models in vivo. Omomyc action is different from the one that can be obtained by gene knockout or RNA interference, approaches designed to block all functions of a gene product. This molecule--instead--appears to cause an edge-specific perturbation that destroys some protein interactions of the Myc node and keeps others intact, with the result of reshaping the Myc transcriptome. Omomyc selectively targets Myc protein interactions: it binds c- and N-Myc, Max and Miz-1, but does not bind Mad or select HLH proteins. Specifically, it prevents Myc binding to promoter E-boxes and transactivation of target genes while retaining Miz-1 dependent binding to promoters and transrepression. This is accompanied by broad epigenetic changes such as decreased acetylation and increased methylation at H3 lysine 9. In the presence of Omomyc, the Myc interactome is channeled to repression and its activity appears to switch from a pro-oncogenic to a tumor suppressive one. Given the extraordinary therapeutic impact of Omomyc in animal models, these data suggest that successfully targeting Myc for cancer therapy might require a similar twofold action, in order to prevent Myc/Max binding to E-boxes and, at the same time, keep repressing genes that would be repressed by Myc.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCell SurvivalDown-RegulationEpigenesis, GeneticFibroblastsHumansIntracellular SpaceMiceNeoplasmsPeptide FragmentsPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingProteinsomomyc proteinPeptide FragmentsProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21811581
PMCPMC3141027
OpenAlexW2048733157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.