ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011
Antidepressant use and risk of adverse outcomes in older people: population based cohort study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 318 papers, 24 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
318 citing papers in PubMed, 24 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 823 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of antidepressant-induced hyponatremia in geriatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence and risk factors of falls in people on hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Renal failure · 2025Pooled it
- The risk of hyponatremia induced by SSRIs and SNRIs antidepressants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Pooled it
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for late-life depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of physiotherapy techniques on depressive symptoms in older adults: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Acupuncture therapies for post-stroke depression: the evidence mapping of clinical studies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for pain in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Prevalence of Antidepressant Prescriptions for Community-Dwelling Adults Diagnosed with Depressive Disorder in the UK: A Systematic Review.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2024Pooled it
- Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Cognitive behavioural therapy and third-wave approaches for anxiety and related disorders in older people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Optimal dose and type of exercise to improve depressive symptoms in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- The risk of antidepressant-induced hyponatremia: A meta-analysis of antidepressant classes and compounds.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine on poststroke depression in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Combined With Antidepressants in Patients With Poststroke Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Antidepressants and Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- Antidepressants for people with epilepsy and depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Adverse events of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in older adults with depression, a systematic review of the literature.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of massage in the treatment of poststroke depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of protocols.Medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of second-generation antidepressants for the treatment of older adults with depression: questionable benefit and considerations for frailty.BMC geriatrics · 2019Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of Sihogayonggolmoryeo-tang (Saikokaryukotsuboreito, Chai-Hu-Jia-Long-Gu-Mu-Li-Tang) for post-stroke depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2019Pooled it
258 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the association between antidepressant treatment and risk of several potential adverse outcomes in older people with depression and to examine risks by class of antidepressant, duration of use, and dose.
designCohort study of people aged 65 and over diagnosed as having depression.
setting570 general practices in the United Kingdom supplying data to the QResearch primary care database.
participants60,746 patients diagnosed as having a new episode of depression between the ages of 65 and 100 years from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2007 and followed up until 31 December 2008.
main outcome measuresHazard ratios associated with antidepressant use for all cause mortality, attempted suicide/self harm, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, falls, fractures, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, epilepsy/seizures, road traffic accidents, adverse drug reactions, and hyponatraemia, adjusted for a range of potential confounding variables. Hazard ratios were calculated for antidepressant class (tricyclic and related antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, other antidepressants), dose, and duration of use and for commonly prescribed individual drugs.
results54,038 (89.0%) patients received at least one prescription for an antidepressant during follow-up. A total of 1,398,359 antidepressant prescriptions were issued: 764,659 (54.7%) for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, 442,192 (31.6%) for tricyclic antidepressants, 2203 (0.2%) for monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and 189,305 (13.5%) for the group of other antidepressants. The associations with the adverse outcomes differed significantly between the antidepressant classes for seven outcomes. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were associated with the highest adjusted hazard ratios for falls (1.66, 95% confidence interval 1.58 to 1.73) and hyponatraemia (1.52, 1.33 to 1.75) compared with when antidepressants were not being used. The group of other antidepressants was associated with the highest adjusted hazard ratios for all cause mortality (1.66, 1.56 to 1.77), attempted suicide/self harm (5.16, 3.90 to 6.83), stroke/transient ischaemic attack (1.37, 1.22 to 1.55), fracture (1.64, 1.46 to 1.84), and epilepsy/seizures (2.24, 1.60 to 3.15), compared with when antidepressants were not being used. Tricyclic antidepressants did not have the highest hazard ratio for any of the outcomes. Significantly different associations also existed between the individual drugs for the same seven outcomes; trazodone (tricyclic antidepressant), mirtazapine, and venlafaxine (both in the group of other antidepressants) were associated with the highest rates for some of these outcomes. Absolute risks over 1 year for all cause mortality were 7.04% for patients while not taking antidepressants, 8.12% for those taking tricyclic antidepressants, 10.61% for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and 11.43% for other antidepressants.
conclusionsSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and drugs in the group of other antidepressants were associated with an increased risk of several adverse outcomes compared with tricyclic antidepressants. Among individual drugs, trazodone, mirtazapine, and venlafaxine were associated with the highest risks for some outcomes. As this is an observational study, it is susceptible to confounding by indication, channelling bias, and residual confounding, so differences in characteristics between patients prescribed different antidepressant drugs that could account for some of the associations between the drugs and the adverse outcomes may remain. Further research is needed to confirm these findings, but the risks and benefits of different antidepressants should be carefully evaluated when these drugs are prescribed to older people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.