ArticleMolecular genetics and metabolism2011
A Markov model to analyze cost-effectiveness of screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID).
Article in Molecular genetics and metabolism, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes in health economic assessments: the VALENTIA systematic review and qualitative investigation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- The Role of Information Provision in Economic Evaluations of Newborn Bloodspot Screening: A Systematic Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2015Pooled it
- TREC Based Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical immunology · 2015Pooled it
- The cost-benefit of newborn screening for X-linked agammaglobulinemia and related B-cell lymphopenia.Immunologic research · 2026Review
- Nationwide TREC/KREC-based newborn screening and clinical outcomes in Japan.Journal of human immunity · 2026Article
- Data-Related and Methodological Challenges in Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Traditional and Genomic Newborn Screening Programs.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Review
- Standardization of Serodiagnostic Methods for Trypanosoma cruzi.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: a systematic review.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Newborn screening for inborn errors of immunity: The status worldwide.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2024Article
- Paving the way in implementation of SCID newborn screening in developing nations: feasibility study and strategies to move forward in Malaysia.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- The "Other E" in ELSI: The Use of Economic Evaluation to Inform the Expansion of Newborn Screening.Archives of pediatrics (Lisle, IL) · 2024Article
- Review
- Expanding the Australian Newborn Blood Spot Screening Program using genomic sequencing: do we want it and are we ready?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- Genomic-Based Newborn Screening for Inborn Errors of Immunity: Practical and Ethical Considerations.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Article
- Economic Evaluation of Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022Article
- Modelling the Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of a Newborn Screening Program for Spinal Muscular Atrophy and Severe Combined Immunodeficiency.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022Article
- Population-based screening of newborns: Findings from the newborn screening expansion study (part two).Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Modern diagnostic capabilities of neonatal screening for primary immunodeficiencies in newborns.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of universal neonatal screening for T cell lymphocytopenia in enhancing quality of life and life expectancy for children with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID).
methodsDecision trees were created and analyzed to estimate the cost, life years, and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) across a population when universal screening for lack of T cells is used to detect SCID, as implemented in five states, compared to detection based on recognizing symptoms and signs of disease. Terminal values of each tree limb were derived through Markov models simulating the natural history of three cohorts: unaffected subjects; those diagnosed with SCID as neonates (early diagnosis); and those diagnosed after becoming symptomatic and arousing clinical suspicion (late diagnosis). Models considered the costs of screening and of care including hematopoietic cell transplantation for affected individuals. Key decision variables were derived from the literature and from a survey of families with children affected by SCID, which was used to describe the clinical history and healthcare utilization for affected subjects. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the influence of these decision variables.
resultsOver a 70-year time horizon, the average cost per infant was $8.89 without screening and $14.33 with universal screening. The model predicted that universal screening in the U.S. would cost approximately $22.4 million/year with a gain of 880 life years and 802 QALYs. Sensitivity analyses showed that screening test specificity and disease incidence were critical driving forces affecting the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Assuming a SCID incidence of 1/75,000 births and test specificity and sensitivity each at 0.99, screening remained cost-effective up to a maximum cost of $15 per infant screened.
conclusionAt our current estimated screening cost of $4.22/infant, universal screening for SCID would be a cost effective means to improve quality and duration of life for children with SCID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.