ArticleBMC genomics2011
Synergistic use of plant-prokaryote comparative genomics for functional annotations.
Article in BMC genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limitations of current machine learning models in predicting enzymatic functions for uncharacterized proteins.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- A Comparative Metagenomic Analysis of Specified Microorganisms in Groundwater for Non-Sterilized Pharmaceutical Products.Current microbiology · 2024Article
- Chronic industrial perturbation and seasonal change induces shift in the bacterial community from gammaproteobacteria to betaproteobacteria having catabolic potential for aromatic compounds at Amlakhadi canal.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
- A paralog of Pcc1 is the fifth core subunit of the KEOPS tRNA-modifying complex in Archaea.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Confronting the catalytic dark matter encoded by sequenced genomes.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Complete Genome Sequence ofGenome announcements · 2017Article
- Systematic discovery of novel eukaryotic transcriptional regulators using sequence homology independent prediction.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Functional Annotations of Paralogs: A Blessing and a Curse.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Microbial Community Responses to Increased Water and Organic Matter in the Arid Soils of the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- Essentiality of threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t(6)A), a universal tRNA modification, in bacteria.Molecular microbiology · 2015Article
- Captured metagenomics: large-scale targeting of genes based on 'sequence capture' reveals functional diversity in soils.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2015Article
- Variations in metabolic pathways create challenges for automated metabolic reconstructions: Examples from the tetrahydrofolate synthesis pathway.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2014Review
- Diversity of the biosynthesis pathway for threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t(6)A), a universal modification of tRNA.RNA biology · 2014Review
- Functional genomics of novel secondary metabolites from diverse cyanobacteria using untargeted metabolomics.Marine drugs · 2013Article
- Metabolite damage and its repair or pre-emption.Nature chemical biology · 2013Review
- The MORPH algorithm: ranking candidate genes for membership in Arabidopsis and tomato pathways.The Plant cell · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying functions for all gene products in all sequenced organisms is a central challenge of the post-genomic era. However, at least 30-50% of the proteins encoded by any given genome are of unknown or vaguely known function, and a large number are wrongly annotated. Many of these 'unknown' proteins are common to prokaryotes and plants. We set out to predict and experimentally test the functions of such proteins. Our approach to functional prediction integrates comparative genomics based mainly on microbial genomes with functional genomic data from model microorganisms and post-genomic data from plants. This approach bridges the gap between automated homology-based annotations and the classical gene discovery efforts of experimentalists, and is more powerful than purely computational approaches to identifying gene-function associations.
resultsAmong Arabidopsis genes, we focused on those (2,325 in total) that (i) are unique or belong to families with no more than three members, (ii) occur in prokaryotes, and (iii) have unknown or poorly known functions. Computer-assisted selection of promising targets for deeper analysis was based on homology-independent characteristics associated in the SEED database with the prokaryotic members of each family. In-depth comparative genomic analysis was performed for 360 top candidate families. From this pool, 78 families were connected to general areas of metabolism and, of these families, specific functional predictions were made for 41. Twenty-one predicted functions have been experimentally tested or are currently under investigation by our group in at least one prokaryotic organism (nine of them have been validated, four invalidated, and eight are in progress). Ten additional predictions have been independently validated by other groups. Discovering the function of very widespread but hitherto enigmatic proteins such as the YrdC or YgfZ families illustrates the power of our approach.
conclusionsOur approach correctly predicted functions for 19 uncharacterized protein families from plants and prokaryotes; none of these functions had previously been correctly predicted by computational methods. The resulting annotations could be propagated with confidence to over six thousand homologous proteins encoded in over 900 bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic genomes currently available in public databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.