ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2012
Evaluation of third-generation ELISA and a rapid immunochromatographic assay for the detection of norovirus infection in fecal samples from inpatients of a German tertiary care hospital.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- A red/blue bicolor lateral flow immunoassay for simultaneous detection of two enteroviruses based on duplex RT-LAMP.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Acute Infectious Gastroenteritis: The Causative Agents, Omics-Based Detection of Antigens and Novel Biomarkers.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Broad-range and effective detection of human noroviruses by colloidal gold immunochromatographic assay based on the shell domain of the major capsid protein.BMC microbiology · 2021Article
- Norovirus Gastroenteritis among Hospitalized Patients, Germany, 2007-2012.Emerging infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Common Aspects Influencing the Translocation of SERS to Biomedicine.Current medicinal chemistry · 2018Review
- Mapping and modeling of a strain-specific epitope in the Norwalk virus capsid inner shell.Virology · 2016Article
- Microwave-accelerated bioassay technique for rapid and quantitative detection of biological and environmental samples.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2016Article
- Characteristics and outcomes of patients diagnosed with norovirus gastroenteritis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation based on immunochromatography.International journal of hematology · 2015Article
- Norovirus.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015Review
- Sensitive detection of norovirus using phage nanoparticle reporters in lateral-flow assay.PloS one · 2015Article
- Identification of a Broadly Cross-Reactive Epitope in the Inner Shell of the Norovirus Capsid.PloS one · 2013Article
- [Interests and limitations of rapid diagnostic tests for respiratory and gastrointestinal viral diseases].Revue francophone des laboratoires : RFLArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analytical accuracy of the RIDASCREEN Norovirus 3rd Generation ELISA assay and the rapid immunochromatographic RIDAQUICK Norovirus assay were determined in comparison to PCR. In a prospective study 410 consecutive samples were collected from inpatients of a tertiary care hospital in Germany. All samples were tested with the two antigen detection assays, as well as with three different real-time reverse transcription PCR methods as the reference standard. A sample was considered true-positive if at least 2 out of 3 PCR methods yielded a positive signal (137 positive samples, >99% genogroup II). Compared with the PCR-based reference the overall diagnostic sensitivities of the ELISA and the immunochromatographic assay were 77% and 69% and the diagnostic specificities were 96% and 97% respectively. Both assays allow the rapid and economic screening of large numbers of samples and thus are useful diagnostic tools for the detection of suspected norovirus infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.