Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21809031›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2011

An immune function assay predicts post-transplant recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Jian-Wen Cheng, Ying-Hong Shi, Jia Fan, Xiao-Wu Huang, Shuang-Jian Qiu, Yong-Sheng Xiao, Zheng Wang, Zhi Dai, Zhao-You Tang, Jian Zhou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Research progress on liver transplantation therapy for hepatic metastases in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Association between CD4Oncology letters · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Immune monitoring post liver transplant.World journal of transplantation · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jian-Wen ChengDepartment of Liver Surgery, Liver Cancer Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion of Ministry of Education, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 FengLin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Ying-Hong Shi
Jia Fan
Xiao-Wu Huang
Shuang-Jian Qiu
Yong-Sheng Xiao
Zheng Wang
Zhi Dai
Zhao-You Tang
Jian Zhou
Fudan University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CNShanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAn immune function assay has been proposed as a new strategy to monitor immunosuppression after organ transplantation. However, there are limited data regarding its role in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we sought to determine the utility of this functional assay in assessing the risk of infection, rejection, and tumor recurrence in liver transplant recipients.

methodsImmune function was determined by ImmuKnow assay that measures the amount of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) produced by CD4 (+) T cells to monitor the global immune status in 342 whole blood samples from 105 liver transplant recipients. The association between ATP value and post-transplant tumor recurrence was evaluated in 60 HCC patients. The ATP value in predicting tumor recurrence in other independent cohort of 92 recipients with HCC was analyzed prospectively.

resultsThe mean ATP values of liver transplant recipients with infection (145.2 ± 87.0 ng/ml) or acute rejection (418.9 ± 169.5 ng/ml) were different from those with stable state (286.6 ± 143.9 ng/ml, P < 0.05). In recipients with HCC who developed recurrent tumors, the values were significantly lower than those without recurrence (137.8 ± 66.4 vs. 289 ± 133.9 ng/ml, P < 0.01); the optimal threshold value to predict post-transplant tumor recurrence was 175 ng/ml. Comparing with the patients in lower immune group (ATP ≤ 175 ng/ml), patients in the higher immune group (ATP > 175 ng/ml) experienced significantly better disease-free survival (P < 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed the ATP value was an independent predictor of HCC recurrence.

conclusionsThe immune function assay has the potential to assess the risk of infection and rejection in liver transplantation and to predict post-transplant tumor recurrence in recipients with HCC.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationAdenosine TriphosphateAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsAdenosine TriphosphateImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID21809031
PMCPMC11827982
OpenAlexW2092533250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.