Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21808267›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2011

Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer.

Steven A Narod

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05850637 (Phase II Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Toxicity of Adjuvant Ultra-hypofractionated Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05850637 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Toxicity of Adjuvant Ultra-hypofractionated Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrevent Senior InstituteRan2019 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsBreast Cancer FemaleArmsadjuvant ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Association between FAS 1377G>A polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. PI3 K/AKT/mTOR pathway and its role in breast cancer stem cells.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Estrogens and breast cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven A NarodWomen's College Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5A 2T3, Canada. steven.narod@wchospital.ca
Women's College Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is given to relieve the climacteric symptoms of menopause. Use of HRT reduced after a report from the Women's Health Initiative linked it to an increased risk of breast cancer. This association has been confirmed in several other studies, including the Million Women Study. The risk of breast cancer is greater for formulations that contain both estrogen and progesterone, compared with estrogen alone. The breast cancer risk associated with HRT is higher for estrogen receptor-positive cancers than for estrogen receptor-negative cancers, and for low-grade cancers compared with high-grade cancers. After cessation of HRT the increased risk of breast cancer dissipates within 2 years. The rapidity of the decline suggests that a proportion of breast cancers that are hormone dependent will regress if the hormonal stimulation is removed. In evaluating a woman who is considering HRT, factors that have been associated with an increased risk include the initiation of hormone use immediately after menopause, a lean body mass and high mammographic breast density.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogensFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHormone Replacement TherapyHumansIncidenceMeta-Analysis as TopicMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasms, Hormone-DependentEstrogensProgestins

Identifiers

PMID21808267
OpenAlexW2078922516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.