Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21808261›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2011

Systems-biology approaches for predicting genomic evolution.

Balázs Papp, Richard A Notebaart, Csaba Pál

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The metabolic domestication syndrome of budding yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Mutation bias and the predictability of evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. A tractable physical model for the yeast polarity predicts epistasis and fitness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Investigating the Evolution and Development of Biological Systems from the Perspective of Thermo-Kinetics and Systems Theory.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Balázs PappSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Center, Temesvári krt. 62, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Richard A Notebaart
Csaba Pál

Funding

Wellcome Trust 084314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Is evolution predictable at the molecular level? The ambitious goal to answer this question requires an understanding of the mutational effects that govern the complex relationship between genotype and phenotype. In practice, it involves integrating systems-biology modelling, microbial laboratory evolution experiments and large-scale mutational analyses - a feat that is made possible by the recent availability of the necessary computational tools and experimental techniques. This Review investigates recent progresses in mapping evolutionary trajectories and discusses the degree to which these predictions are realistic.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeAdaptation, BiologicalEpistasis, GeneticGene DuplicationGenotypeMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalPhenotypeSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID21808261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.