Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21808005›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Impact of a stress-inducible switch to mutagenic repair of DNA breaks on mutation in Escherichia coli.

Chandan Shee, Janet L Gibson, Michele C Darrow, Caleb Gonzalez, Susan M Rosenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Antibiotic-recalcitrant Salmonella during infection.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chandan SheeDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Janet L Gibson
Michele C Darrow
Caleb Gonzalez
Susan M Rosenberg
Baylor College of Medicine · USCenter for Systems Biology · US

Funding

Initiative for Maximizing Student Development (IMSD) ProgramR25GM056929 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PEREIRA, FRED A · 1998 to 2023
$12.4M
MOLECULAR MECHANISMS /STRESS-INDUCED MUTATION /E. COLIR01GM053158 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ROSENBERG, SUSAN M · 1997 to 2014
$7.4M
Forward Genomics of Damage Control: An Undiscovered Class of Cancer GenesDP1CA174424 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ROSENBERG, SUSAN M · 2012 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS DP1 CA174424NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM053158NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM53158NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM056929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basic ideas about the constancy and randomness of mutagenesis that drives evolution were challenged by the discovery of mutation pathways activated by stress responses. These pathways could promote evolution specifically when cells are maladapted to their environment (i.e., are stressed). However, the clearest example--a general stress-response-controlled switch to error-prone DNA break (double-strand break, DSB) repair--was suggested to be peculiar to an Escherichia coli F' conjugative plasmid, not generally significant, and to occur by an alternative stress-independent mechanism. Moreover, mechanisms of spontaneous mutation in E. coli remain obscure. First, we demonstrate that this same mechanism occurs in chromosomes of starving F(-) E. coli. I-SceI endonuclease-induced chromosomal DSBs increase mutation 50-fold, dependent upon general/starvation- and DNA-damage-stress responses, DinB error-prone DNA polymerase, and DSB-repair proteins. Second, DSB repair is also mutagenic if the RpoS general-stress-response activator is expressed in unstressed cells, illustrating a stress-response-controlled switch to mutagenic repair. Third, DSB survival is not improved by RpoS or DinB, indicating that mutagenesis is not an inescapable byproduct of repair. Importantly, fourth, fully half of spontaneous frame-shift and base-substitution mutation during starvation also requires the same stress-response, DSB-repair, and DinB proteins. These data indicate that DSB-repair-dependent stress-induced mutation, driven by spontaneous DNA breaks, is a pathway that cells usually use and a major source of spontaneous mutation. These data also rule out major alternative models for the mechanism. Mechanisms that couple mutagenesis to stress responses can allow cells to evolve rapidly and responsively to their environment.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDNA RepairEscherichia coliMutagenesisMutationStarvationStress, Physiological

Identifiers

PMID21808005
PMCPMC3158223
OpenAlexW2009586297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.