Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21807979›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

Gentamicin improves the activities of daptomycin and vancomycin against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro and in an experimental foreign-body infection model.

Ulrika Furustrand Tafin, Ivana Majic, Cyrine Zalila Belkhodja, Bertrand Betrisey, Stéphane Corvec, Werner Zimmerli, Andrej Trampuz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bugs on Drugs: AMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antibiotic Resistance in Enterococcus faecalis Isolated from Hospitalized Patients.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2013
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ulrika Furustrand TafinInfectious Diseases Service, Department of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ivana Majic
Cyrine Zalila Belkhodja
Bertrand Betrisey
Stéphane Corvec
Werner Zimmerli
Andrej Trampuz
University of Lausanne · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRKantonsspital Baselland · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For enterococcal implant-associated infections, the optimal treatment regimen has not been defined. We investigated the activity of daptomycin, vancomycin, and gentamicin (and their combinations) against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro and in a foreign-body infection model. Antimicrobial activity was investigated by time-kill and growth-related heat production studies (microcalorimetry) as well as with a guinea pig model using subcutaneously implanted cages. Infection was established by percutaneous injection of E. faecalis in the cage. Antibiotic treatment for 4 days was started 3 h after infection. Cages were removed 5 days after end of treatment to determine the cure rate. The MIC, the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) in the logarithmic phase, and the MBC in the stationary phase were 1.25, 5, and >20 μg/ml for daptomycin, 1, >64, and >64 μg/ml for vancomycin, and 16, 32, and 4 μg/ml for gentamicin, respectively. In vitro, gentamicin at subinhibitory concentrations improved the activity against E. faecalis when combined with daptomycin or vancomycin in the logarithmic and stationary phases. In the animal model, daptomycin cured 25%, vancomycin 17%, and gentamicin 50% of infected cages. In combination with gentamicin, the cure rate for daptomycin increased to 55% and that of vancomycin increased to 33%. In conclusion, daptomycin was more active than vancomycin against adherent E. faecalis, and its activity was further improved by the addition of gentamicin. Despite a short duration of infection (3 h), the cure rates did not exceed 55%, highlighting the difficulty of eradicating E. faecalis from implants already in the early stage of implant-associated infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDaptomycinDrug Therapy, CombinationEnterococcus faecalisGentamicinsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsGuinea PigsMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProsthesis-Related InfectionsVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsDaptomycinGentamicinsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID21807979
PMCPMC3186955
OpenAlexW2139986510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.