ArticleNeuro-oncology2011
Bevacizumab-induced tumor calcifications as a surrogate marker of outcome in patients with glioblastoma.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Baseline T1 hyperintense and diffusion-restricted lesions are not linked to prolonged survival in bevacizumab-treated glioblastoma patients of the GLARIUS trial.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Trial
- Comparison of 2D (RANO) and volumetric methods for assessment of recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab-a report from the BELOB trial.Neuro-oncology · 2017Trial
- Quantitative susceptibility mapping differentiates between blood depositions and calcifications in patients with glioblastoma.PloS one · 2013Trial
- Trial
- Mechanism and significance of diffusion restriction followed by calcification in high-grade glioma treated with bevacizumab.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Molecular matched targeted therapies for primary brain tumors-a single center retrospective analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- Altered Elemental Distribution in Male Rat Brain Tissue as a Predictor of Glioblastoma Multiforme Growth-Studies Using SR-XRF Microscopy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Effect of bevacizumab against cystic components of brain tumors.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- Bevacizumab as a last-line treatment for glioblastoma following failure of radiotherapy, temozolomide and lomustine.Oncology letters · 2017Article
- Increase in post-therapy tumor calcification on CT scan is not an indicator of response to therapy in low-grade serous ovarian cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2016Article
- Bevacizumab and radiotherapy for the treatment of glioblastoma: brothers in arms or unholy alliance?Oncotarget · 2016Review
- Advanced MR Imaging in Neuro-oncology.Clinical neuroradiology · 2015Review
- Current standards and new concepts in MRI and PET response assessment of antiangiogenic therapies in high-grade glioma patients.Neuro-oncology · 2015Review
- [Towards more precision in the therapy of brain tumors. Possibilities and limits of MRI].Der Nervenarzt · 2015Article
- Calcification in high grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2015Article
- Lessons from anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor trials in patients with glioblastoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015Article
- Vascular change measured with independent component analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI predicts bevacizumab response in high-grade glioma.Neuro-oncology · 2013Article
- Standard clinical approaches and emerging modalities for glioblastoma imaging.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapy-induced calcifications in glioblastoma are rarely recognized. They may represent regressive changes in the tumor tissue, but their occurrence and possible predictive or prognostic value have not been systematically assessed. The observation of hyperintense lesions on precontrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRIs) in 2 index patients with glioblastoma after therapy with bevacizumab, subsequently identified as calcifications on computed tomographs (CTs), prompted us to prospectively screen for these radiographic changes. Therefore, 36 patients with recurrent glioblastoma prospectively treated with bevacizumab in an observational trial were examined every 8 weeks by MRI and, if clinically necessary, by CT. In 22 patients (61.1%), T1 hyperintense lesions became apparent after bevacizumab treatment. The median time to detection of these lesions was 55 days. In 14 (63.6%) of 22 patients, CTs were available and confirmed the existence of tumor calcifications. No substantial changes in T1 hyperintense lesions or calcifications were recognized on additional MRI or CT scans. Interestingly, the patients with therapy-induced T1 hyperintense lesions had better durations of progression-free survival than patients without these changes (median, 5.8 vs 3.5 months; P< .001), and the duration of overall survival was also superior (median, 9.7 vs 5.0 months; P= .006). There was a striking correlation between the appearance of therapy-induced T1 hyperintense lesions and overall response to bevacizumab. Therefore, this phenomenon is a rather early and time-limited event during the first weeks of treatment and appears to be response related. In summary, T1 hyperintense lesions are common in patients with glioblastoma who have been exposed to bevacizumab, may represent a novel biomarker of response and outcome, and seem to correspond to tumor calcifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.