Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21807600›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2011

Clinical validation of a genetic model to estimate the risk of developing choroidal neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Gregory S Hageman, Karen Gehrs, Serguei Lejnine, Aruna T Bansal, Margaret M Deangelis, Robyn H Guymer, Paul N Baird, Rando Allikmets, Cosmin Deciu, Paul Oeth and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02779686 (PIIR Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02779686 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

PIIR Study: Comparison of Genetic Tests for Age-Related Macular Degeneration

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaRan2012 to 2012Enrolled32ConditionsAge-Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Age-related macular degeneration: genome-wide association studies to translation.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Review
  13. Review
  14. AMD Genetics in India: The Missing Links.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Gregory S HagemanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Karen Gehrs
Serguei Lejnine
Aruna T Bansal
Margaret M Deangelis
Robyn H Guymer
Paul N Baird
Rando Allikmets
Cosmin Deciu
Paul Oeth
Lorah T Perlee
Sequenom (United States) · USUniversity of Utah · USAmgen (United Kingdom) · GBCBE Consultants, Inc. (United States)Centre for Eye Research Australia · AUColumbia University · USLa Jolla Institute For Molecular Medicine · USMacula and Retina Institute · USUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Development of Complement Modulating Therapeutics for AMDR24EY017404 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HAGEMAN, GREGORY S · 2006 to 2010
$14.8M
University of Utah, Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Behrad Noudoost · 2005 to 2026
$14.6M
Genetic Variation in Age-Related Macular DegenerationR01EY013435 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ALLIKMETS, RANDO L · 2001 to 2014
$7.7M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013435NEI NIH HHS R24 EY017404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive tests for estimating the risk of developing late-stage neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are subject to unique challenges. AMD prevalence increases with age, clinical phenotypes are heterogeneous and control collections are prone to high false-negative rates, as many control subjects are likely to develop disease with advancing age. Risk prediction tests have been presented previously, using up to ten genetic markers and a range of self-reported non-genetic variables such as body mass index (BMI) and smoking history. In order to maximise the accuracy of prediction for mainstream genetic testing, we sought to derive a test comparable in performance to earlier testing models but based purely on genetic markers, which are static through life and not subject to misreporting. We report a multicentre assessment of a larger panel of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) than previously analysed, to improve further the classification performance of a predictive test to estimate the risk of developing choroidal neovascular (CNV) disease. We developed a predictive model based solely on genetic markers and avoided inclusion of self-reported variables (eg smoking history) or non-static factors (BMI, education status) that might otherwise introduce inaccuracies in calculating individual risk estimates. We describe the performance of a test panel comprising 13 SNPs genotyped across a consolidated collection of four patient cohorts obtained from academic centres deemed appropriate for pooling. We report on predictive effect sizes and their classification performance. By incorporating multiple cohorts of homogeneous ethnic origin, we obtained >80 per cent power to detect differences in genetic variants observed between cases and controls. We focused our study on CNV, a subtype of advanced AMD associated with a severe and potentially treatable form of the disease. Lastly, we followed a two-stage strategy involving both test model development and test model validation to present estimates of classification performance anticipated in the larger clinical setting. The model contained nine SNPs tagging variants in the regulators of complement activation (RCA) locus spanning the complement factor H (CFH), complement factor H-related 4 (CFHR4), complement factor H-related 5 (CFHR5) and coagulation factor XIII B subunit (F13B) genes; the four remaining SNPs targeted polymorphisms in the complement component 2 (C2), complement factor B (CFB), complement component 3 (C3) and age-related maculopathy susceptibility protein 2 (ARMS2) genes. The pooled sample size (1,132 CNV cases, 822 controls) allowed for both model development and model validation to confirm the accuracy of risk prediction. At the validation stage, our test model yielded 82 per cent sensitivity and 63 per cent specificity, comparable with metrics reported with earlier testing models that included environmental risk factors. Our test had an area under the curve of 0.80, reflecting a modest improvement compared with tests reported with fewer SNPs.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexCase-Control StudiesChoroidal NeovascularizationCohort StudiesComplement C2Complement C3Complement Factor BComplement Factor HGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMacular DegenerationMiddle AgedOdds RatioComplement C2Complement C3Complement Factor BComplement Factor H

Identifiers

PMID21807600
PMCPMC3525964
OpenAlexW2147166769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.