ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2011
High throughput platforms for structural genomics of integral membrane proteins.
Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Crystallography and Cryo-Electron Microscopy for the Study of Membrane Proteins.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Ion channel inhibition by targeted recruitment of NEDD4-2 with divalent nanobodies.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Structural basis of peptidoglycan synthesis by E. coli RodA-PBP2 complex.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Cryo-electron microscopy analysis of small membrane proteins.Current opinion in structural biology · 2020Review
- Article
- A mutagenesis and screening strategy to generate optimally thermostabilized membrane proteins for structural studies.Nature protocols · 2016Article
- Structure of the polyisoprenyl-phosphate glycosyltransferase GtrB and insights into the mechanism of catalysis.Nature communications · 2016Article
- X-ray crystallography over the past decade for novel drug discovery - where are we heading next?Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2015Review
- Quality control in eukaryotic membrane protein overproduction.Journal of molecular biology · 2014Article
- Structural basis for catalysis in a CDP-alcohol phosphotransferase.Nature communications · 2014Article
- Overexpression of membrane proteins in mammalian cells for structural studies.Molecular membrane biology · 2013Review
- An efficient strategy for small-scale screening and production of archaeal membrane transport proteins in Escherichia coli.PloS one · 2013Article
- Highlights from recently determined structures of membrane proteins: a focus on channels and transporters.Current opinion in structural biology · 2012Review
- Structural genomics plucks high-hanging membrane proteins.Current opinion in structural biology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural genomics approaches on integral membrane proteins have been postulated for over a decade, yet specific efforts are lagging years behind their soluble counterparts. Indeed, high throughput methodologies for production and characterization of prokaryotic integral membrane proteins are only now emerging, while large-scale efforts for eukaryotic ones are still in their infancy. Presented here is a review of recent literature on actively ongoing structural genomics of membrane protein initiatives, with a focus on those aimed at implementing interesting techniques aimed at increasing our rate of success for this class of macromolecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.