Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21807172›Full record

ReviewRadiologic clinics of North America2011

Imaging pediatric bone sarcomas.

Sue C Kaste

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologic clinics of North America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [MR Imaging Features of Pediatric Bone Marrow].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sue C KasteDepartment of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, MSN #220, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105, USA. sue.kaste@stjude.org

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
TREATMENT OF RELAPSEP01CA020180 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI LOOK, A THOMAS · 1985 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA-20180NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS P30 CA-21765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary malignant bone tumors are rare and account for about 6% of all new pediatric cancer cases per year in the United States. Identification of the lesion not uncommonly occurs as a result of imaging performed for trauma. Clinical and standard imaging characteristics of the various tumor types are evolving in concert with treatment advancements and clinical trial regimens. This article reviews the 3 most common pediatric bone sarcomas-osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma-and their imaging as applicable to contemporary disease staging and monitoring, and explores the roles of evolving imaging techniques.

Indexed as

AdolescentBone NeoplasmsChildDiagnostic ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePositron-Emission TomographyRadionuclide ImagingSarcomaTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID21807172
PMCPMC4725719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.