ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2012
Application of direct PCR in a forensic case of yew poisoning.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid and Visual Identification ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- A proof of principal study on the use of direct PCR of semen and spermatozoa and development of a differential isolation protocol for use in cases of alleged sexual assault.International journal of legal medicine · 2017Article
- DNA profiles from fingernails using direct PCR.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2015Article
- Successful direct amplification of nuclear markers from a single hair follicle.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intoxications with yew (Taxus spp.) pose a challenge to forensic toxicology because a variety of Taxus ingredients have been associated with its toxic effects. To provide preliminary evidence in cases where plant material is available, we introduce a novel direct PCR assay for the detection of DNA traces from Taxus spp. This assay has been successfully applied to a forensic case of suicidal poisoning via ingestion of Taxus leaves. PCR primers were designed to target a sequence located in the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) of nuclear ribosomal DNA, which is well conserved among species of the genus Taxus and can, therefore, be exploited to discriminate between Taxus and other conifers. Because ITS1 exists as a multicopy sequence within the plant genome, the assay provides enough sensitivity to work with trace amounts that are below the DNA content of a single cell. Specificity of the assay was tested with DNA extracts from Taxaceae and selected representatives from other related plant families (Cephalotaxaceae, Cupressaceae and Pinaceae). When combined with the commercial Phire® Plant Direct PCR Kit (Finnzymes), the primers allowed application of a two-step cycling protocol (without the annealing step), and because direct PCR requires only little sample pre-treatment, results from PCR could be obtained within 1.5 h after analysis had begun. Direct PCR was performed with diluted gastric content from the forensic case. Amplification products of the expected size were purified and sequenced. Sequence data were subjected to Basic Local Alignment Search Tool analysis and affiliated with ITS1 from Taxus spp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.