Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21805273›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2011

Ciona genetics.

Michael T Veeman, Shota Chiba, William C Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Brachyury controlsDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Fold Change Detection in Visual Processing.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Article
  8. Quantitative Dissection of the ProximalFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Functional and evolutionary insights from theDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael T VeemanDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. veeman@lifesci.ucsb.edu
Shota Chiba
William C Smith
University of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Mutational Analysis of Tunicate DevelopmentR01HD038701 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI SMITH, WILLIAM · 2000 to 2020
$5.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD038701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ascidians, such as Ciona, are invertebrate chordates with simple embryonic body plans and small, relatively non-redundant genomes. Ciona genetics is in its infancy compared to many other model systems, but it provides a powerful method for studying this important vertebrate outgroup. Here we give basic methods for genetic analysis of Ciona, including protocols for controlled crosses both by natural spawning and by the surgical isolation of gametes; the identification and propagation of mutant lines; and strategies for positional cloning.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesAnimalsChromosome MappingCloning, MolecularCryopreservationDNADNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleFertilization in VitroHybridization, GeneticLarvaMaleMicroinjectionsMutationPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA

Identifiers

PMID21805273
PMCPMC3149854
OpenAlexW4230139932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.