Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21805170›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2011

Hepatocellular carcinoma screening rates vary by etiology of cirrhosis and involvement of gastrointestinal sub-specialists.

Vilas Patwardhan, Sonali Paul, Kathleen E Corey, Sameer M Mazhar, James M Richter, Michael Thiim, Raymond T Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Liver-Related Mortality.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Strategies to Improve Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Veterans With Hepatitis B Infection.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vilas PatwardhanDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Warren 1007, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. vpatwardhan@partners.org
Sonali Paul
Kathleen E Corey
Sameer M Mazhar
James M Richter
Michael Thiim
Raymond T Chung
Massachusetts General Hospital · USMass General Brigham · US

Funding

Training Grant in GastroenterologyT32DK007202 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GHOSH, PRADIPTA · 1985 to 2022
$7.7M
Patient-Oriented Research on Hepatitis in Special PopulationsK24DK078772 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHUNG, RAYMOND T · 2007 to 2016
$1.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK078772NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK078772NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegular screening of cirrhotic patients for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been suboptimal, but there is little data regarding specific risk factors for reduced screening.

methodsFrom 1996 to 2010, patients with cirrhosis were retrospectively identified from outpatient gastroenterology and primary care practices. Data was obtained from the diagnosis of cirrhosis until the time of elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) or lesion suspicious for HCC, death, liver transplantation, or end of the data collection period. Recommended screening was defined as abdominal imaging (ultrasound, contrast-enhanced CT, or MRI) with or without serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) at least once every 12 months based on professional guidelines.

resultsOne hundred fifty-six patients with cirrhosis were identified. The etiologies of cirrhosis were viral hepatitis (n = 65), alcohol (n = 40), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (n = 27), and non-viral, non-alcoholic, non-NASH cirrhosis (n = 24). Of the 156 patients, 51% received recommended screening for HCC. Patients with NASH cirrhosis received recommended screening significantly less (p = 0.016) than cirrhotics with viral hepatitis, alcoholic cirrhosis, or non-viral, non-alcoholic, non-NASH cirrhosis and were less likely to receive gastroenterology referral (p < 0.001). Additionally, 20 patients were diagnosed with cirrhosis incidentally during a surgical procedure. These patients were significantly less likely to receive recommended HCC screening than those diagnosed non-surgically (10.0 vs. 56.6%; p < 0.001). Screening was significantly more likely to occur in patients seen regularly by a gastrointestinal subspecialist (66.7 vs. 22.8%; p < 0.001).

conclusionsPatients with NASH cirrhosis and incidentally discovered cirrhosis have low rates of HCC screening and are referred less often to gastroenterologists. These data suggest a need for increased education about NASH cirrhosis and better systems of communication among general practitioners, surgeons, and gastroenterologists.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleGastroenterologyHumansLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID21805170
PMCPMC3773181
OpenAlexW2151277759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.