ArticleIntensive care medicine2011
Predicting prolonged intensive care unit stays in older cardiac surgery patients: a validation study.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02535728 (Anesthesia Geriatric Evaluation and the Prediction of Quality of Life in Elderly Cardiac Surgery Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Anesthesia Geriatric Evaluation and the Prediction of Quality of Life in Elderly Cardiac Surgery Patients
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vasoactive-inotropic score and the prediction of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery.British journal of anaesthesia · 2019Article
- The Efficacy of Inpatient vs. Home-Based Physiotherapy Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Observational
- The definition of a prolonged intensive care unit stay for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients: an application with national health insurance research database.BioMed research international · 2014Article
- Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2011: I. Nephrology, epidemiology, nutrition and therapeutics, neurology, ethical and legal issues, experimentals.Intensive care medicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn cardiac surgery prediction models identifying patients at risk of prolonged stay at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are used to optimize treatment and use of ICU resources. A recent systematic validation study of 14 of these models identified three models with a good predictive performance across patients of all ages. It is however unclear how these models perform in older patients, who nowadays form a considerable part of this patient population. The current study specifically validates the performance of these three models in older cardiac surgery patients and quantifies how their performance changes with increasing age of patients.
methodsThe Parsonnet model, the EuroSCORE, and a model by Huijskes and colleagues were validated using prospectively collected data of 11,395 cardiac surgery patients. Performance of the models was described by discrimination (area under the ROC curve, AUC) and calibration.
resultsFor the Parsonnet model, the EuroSCORE and the Huijskes model discrimination clearly decreased with increasing age (AUCs of 0.76, 0.71 and 0.72 for ages 70-75 and 0.72, 0.70 and 0.72, respectively, for ages 75-80 and 0.68, 0.64 and 0.69, respectively, above 80 years). The models showed poor calibration in patients aged >70 (p values for fit of the models <0.006).
conclusionsTo optimize treatment and ICU resources, risk prediction for prolonged ICU stay after cardiac surgery using the existing models should be done with great care for older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21805158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.